# BFS vs DFS for Binary Tree

**What are BFS and DFS for Binary Tree?**

A Tree is typically traversed in two ways:

- Breadth First Traversal (Or Level Order Traversal)
- Depth First Traversals
- Inorder Traversal (Left-Root-Right)
- Preorder Traversal (Root-Left-Right)
- Postorder Traversal (Left-Right-Root)

BFS and DFSs of above Tree Breadth First Traversal : 1 2 3 4 5 Depth First Traversals: Preorder Traversal : 1 2 4 5 3 Inorder Traversal : 4 2 5 1 3 Postorder Traversal : 4 5 2 3 1

**Why do we care?**

There are many tree questions that can be solved using any of the above four traversals. Examples of such questions are size, maximum, minimum, print left view, etc.

**Is there any difference in terms of Time Complexity?**

All four traversals require O(n) time as they visit every node exactly once.

**Is there any difference in terms of Extra Space?**

There is difference in terms of extra space required.

- Extra Space required for Level Order Traversal is O(w) where w is maximum width of Binary Tree. In level order traversal, queue one by one stores nodes of different level.
- Extra Space required for Depth First Traversals is O(h) where h is maximum height of Binary Tree. In Depth First Traversals, stack (or function call stack) stores all ancestors of a node.

Maximum Width of a Binary Tree at depth (or height) h can be 2^{h} where h starts from 0. So the maximum number of nodes can be at the last level. And worst case occurs when Binary Tree is a perfect Binary Tree with numbers of nodes like 1, 3, 7, 15, …etc. In worst case, value of 2^{h} is **Ceil(n/2)**.

Height for a Balanced Binary Tree is O(Log n). Worst case occurs for skewed tree and worst case height becomes O(n).

So in worst case extra space required is O(n) for both. But worst cases occur for different types of trees.

**It is evident from above points that extra space required for Level order traversal is likely to be more when tree is more balanced and extra space for Depth First Traversal is likely to be more when tree is less balanced.**

**How to Pick One?**

- Extra Space can be one factor (Explained above)
- Depth First Traversals are typically recursive and recursive code requires function call overheads.
- The most important points is, BFS starts visiting nodes from root while DFS starts visiting nodes from leaves. So if our problem is to search something that is more likely to closer to root, we would prefer BFS. And if the target node is close to a leaf, we would prefer DFS.

**Exercise:**

Which traversal should be used to print leaves of Binary Tree and why?

Which traversal should be used to print nodes at k’th level where k is much less than total number of levels?

This article is contributed by **Dheeraj Gupta**. This Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above

## Recommended Posts:

- Complexity of different operations in Binary tree, Binary Search Tree and AVL tree
- Minimum swap required to convert binary tree to binary search tree
- Check whether a binary tree is a full binary tree or not | Iterative Approach
- Convert a Binary Tree to Threaded binary tree | Set 1 (Using Queue)
- Convert a Binary Tree to Threaded binary tree | Set 2 (Efficient)
- Binary Tree to Binary Search Tree Conversion
- Check whether a given binary tree is skewed binary tree or not?
- Binary Tree to Binary Search Tree Conversion using STL set
- Check if a binary tree is subtree of another binary tree | Set 1
- Check whether a binary tree is a full binary tree or not
- Check if a binary tree is subtree of another binary tree | Set 2
- Given level order traversal of a Binary Tree, check if the Tree is a Min-Heap
- Convert an arbitrary Binary Tree to a tree that holds Children Sum Property
- Print Binary Tree levels in sorted order | Set 3 (Tree given as array)
- Convert a given Binary tree to a tree that holds Logical AND property