You are given two balanced binary search trees e.g., AVL or Red Black Tree. Write a function that merges the two given balanced BSTs into a balanced binary search tree. Let there be m elements in first tree and n elements in the other tree. Your merge function should take O(m+n) time.
In the following solutions, it is assumed that sizes of trees are also given as input. If the size is not given, then we can get the size by traversing the tree (See this).
Method 1 (Insert elements of first tree to second)
Take all elements of first BST one by one, and insert them into the second BST. Inserting an element to a self balancing BST takes Logn time (See this) where n is size of the BST. So time complexity of this method is Log(n) + Log(n+1) … Log(m+n-1). The value of this expression will be between mLogn and mLog(m+n-1). As an optimization, we can pick the smaller tree as first tree.
Method 2 (Merge Inorder Traversals)
1) Do inorder traversal of first tree and store the traversal in one temp array arr1. This step takes O(m) time.
2) Do inorder traversal of second tree and store the traversal in another temp array arr2. This step takes O(n) time.
3) The arrays created in step 1 and 2 are sorted arrays. Merge the two sorted arrays into one array of size m + n. This step takes O(m+n) time.
4) Construct a balanced tree from the merged array using the technique discussed in this post. This step takes O(m+n) time.
Time complexity of this method is O(m+n) which is better than method 1. This method takes O(m+n) time even if the input BSTs are not balanced.
Following is implementation of this method.
Following is Inorder traversal of the merged tree 20 40 50 70 80 100 120 300
Method 3 (In-Place Merge using DLL)
We can use a Doubly Linked List to merge trees in place. Following are the steps.
1) Convert the given two Binary Search Trees into doubly linked list in place (Refer this post for this step).
2) Merge the two sorted Linked Lists (Refer this post for this step).
3) Build a Balanced Binary Search Tree from the merged list created in step 2. (Refer this post for this step)
Time complexity of this method is also O(m+n) and this method does conversion in place.
Thanks to Dheeraj and Ronzii for suggesting this method.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above.
Don’t stop now and take your learning to the next level. Learn all the important concepts of Data Structures and Algorithms with the help of the most trusted course: DSA Self Paced. Become industry ready at a student-friendly price.
- Total number of possible Binary Search Trees and Binary Trees with n keys
- Count the Number of Binary Search Trees present in a Binary Tree
- Self-Balancing-Binary-Search-Trees (Comparisons)
- Check whether the two Binary Search Trees are Identical or Not
- Print Common Nodes in Two Binary Search Trees
- Total number of possible Binary Search Trees using Catalan Number
- Binary Search Tree | Set 1 (Search and Insertion)
- How to determine if a binary tree is height-balanced?
- Check if the Binary Tree contains a balanced BST of size K
- Create Balanced Binary Tree using its Leaf Nodes without using extra space
- Check if a given Binary Tree is height balanced like a Red-Black Tree
- Sum of all the levels in a Binary Search Tree
- Make Binary Search Tree
- Binary Search Tree | Set 2 (Delete)
- Floor in Binary Search Tree (BST)
- Optimal Binary Search Tree | DP-24
- How to handle duplicates in Binary Search Tree?
- Treap (A Randomized Binary Search Tree)
- Binary Search Tree | Set 3 (Iterative Delete)
- Print all even nodes of Binary Search Tree