This pattern is easy to understand as the real world is full of adapters. For example consider a USB to Ethernet adapter. We need this when we have an Ethernet interface on one end and USB on the other. Since they are incompatible with each other. we use an adapter that converts one to other. This example is pretty analogous to Object Oriented Adapters. In design, adapters are used when we have a class (Client) expecting some type of object and we have an object (Adaptee) offering the same features but exposing a different interface.
To use an adapter:
- The client makes a request to the adapter by calling a method on it using the target interface.
- The adapter translates that request on the adaptee using the adaptee interface.
- Client receive the results of the call and is unaware of adapter’s presence.
The adapter pattern convert the interface of a class into another interface clients expect. Adapter lets classes work together that couldn’t otherwise because of incompatible interfaces.
The client sees only the target interface and not the adapter. The adapter implements the target interface. Adapter delegates all requests to Adaptee.
Suppose you have a Bird class with fly() , and makeSound()methods. And also a ToyDuck class with squeak() method. Let’s assume that you are short on ToyDuck objects and you would like to use Bird objects in their place. Birds have some similar functionality but implement a different interface, so we can’t use them directly. So we will use adapter pattern. Here our client would be ToyDuck and adaptee would be Bird.
Below is Java implementation of it.
Sparrow... Flying Chirp Chirp ToyDuck... Squeak BirdAdapter... Chirp Chirp
Suppose we have a bird that can makeSound(), and we have a plastic toy duck that can squeak(). Now suppose our client changes the requirement and he wants the toyDuck to makeSound than ?
Simple solution is that we will just change the implementation class to the new adapter class and tell the client to pass the instance of the bird(which wants to squeak()) to that class.
Before : ToyDuck toyDuck = new PlasticToyDuck();
After : ToyDuck toyDuck = new BirdAdapter(sparrow);
You can see that by changing just one line the toyDuck can now do Chirp Chirp !!
Object Adapter Vs Class Adapter
The adapter pattern we have implemented above is called Object Adapter Pattern because the adapter holds an instance of adaptee. There is also another type called Class Adapter Pattern which use inheritance instead of composition but you require multiple inheritance to implement it.
Class diagram of Class Adapter Pattern:
Here instead of having an adaptee object inside adapter (composition) to make use of its functionality adapter inherits the adaptee.
Since multiple inheritance is not supported by many languages including java and is associated with many problems we have not shown implementation using class adapter pattern.
- Helps achieve reusability and flexibility.
- Client class is not complicated by having to use a different interface and can use polymorphism to swap between different implementations of adapters.
- All requests are forwarded, so there is a slight increase in the overhead.
- Sometimes many adaptations are required along an adapter chain to reach the type which is required.
Further Read: Adapter Method in Python
Head First Design Patterns ( Book )
This article is contributed by Sulabh Kumar. If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article and mail your article to email@example.com. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above