Why SAFe is better than Scrum?

It is crucial to remember that Scrum and SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) have distinct aims and are appropriate in different situations; they are not intrinsically “better” or “worse” than one another. SAFe, however, might be preferred over Scrum in the following circumstances:

1. Scale: SAFe is made to help larger organisations adopt agile principles by allowing several teams to work on related projects at the same time. It offers direction on coordinating and bringing various teams, business units, and even entire organisations’ efforts into harmony. Conversely, Scrum is generally intended for lone teams working on lone projects.
2. Structure: SAFe provides an organised framework for team, programme, and portfolio levels of the organisation that includes roles, responsibilities, and processes that are well defined. Comparing this formal approach to Scrum, which is lighter and more flexible, can help huge businesses achieve greater clarity and alignment.
3. Integration of Agile Practices: SAFe offers a comprehensive framework for agile development at scale by integrating several agile practices and techniques, such as Scrum, Kanban, Lean, and Extreme Programming (XP). Organizations can use this integration to address their unique demands by utilising the capabilities of several agile approaches.
4. Alignment with Business Objectives: SAFe places a strong emphasis on all organisational levels achieving alignment between business strategy and execution. It offers advice on how to make sure agile projects are leading to significant business results, which is crucial for big businesses with intricate product development procedures.

However, it’s worth noting that SAFe is not without its criticisms. Some organizations may find SAFe to be overly complex and bureaucratic, particularly if they are smaller or less hierarchical. Additionally, successfully implementing SAFe requires significant investment in training and organizational change management.