Why SAFe is better than Agile?

It’s critical to recognise that SAFe, or the Scaled Agile Framework, is a framework for implementing Agile techniques in larger organisations; it is not intrinsically “better” than Agile. Each methodology—SAFe and Agile—has advantages and disadvantages, and which is best for a given organisation will depend on its unique requirements and organisational context.

The following are some justifications for why businesses might pick SAFe over conventional Agile:

1. Scalability: SAFe offers instructions on how to apply Agile methods and concepts to numerous teams, divisions, and even entire companies. This scalability is especially beneficial for large businesses that have intricate product development procedures.
2. Organized Method: SAFe provides an organised structure with distinct roles, duties, and procedures. Compared to the more flexible and adaptive nature of classic Agile, this can offer greater clarity and alignment inside large organisations.
3. Lean and Agile Principles Integration: SAFe combines Agile methods with Lean concepts like value stream mapping and continuous improvement. Organizations can increase overall efficiency and optimise their processes with the aid of this integration.
4. Alignment with Business Objectives: SAFe emphasizes alignment between business strategy and execution at all levels of the organization. This alignment can help ensure that agile initiatives are driving meaningful business outcomes.
5. Standardization: SAFe provides a set of standardized practices and terminology, which can facilitate communication and collaboration across different teams and departments within an organization.

However, it’s worth noting that SAFe is not without its criticisms. Some agile purists argue that SAFe can introduce unnecessary complexity, which may hinder agility and innovation in certain contexts. Additionally, successfully implementing SAFe requires significant investment in training and organizational change management.