range() and xrange() are two functions that could be used to iterate a certain number of times in for loops in Python. In Python 3, there is no xrange , but the range function behaves like xrange in Python 2.If you want to write code that will run on both Python 2 and Python 3, you should use range().
range() – This returns a range object (a type of iterable).
xrange() – This function returns the generator object that can be used to display numbers only by looping. Only particular range is displayed on demand and hence called “lazy evaluation“.
Both are implemented in different ways and have different characteristics associated with them. The points of comparisons are:
- Return Type
- Operation Usage
range() returns – range object.
xrange() returns – xrange() object.
The return type of range() is : <type 'list'> The return type of xrange() is : <type 'xrange'>
The variable storing the range created by range() takes more memory as compared to variable storing the range using xrange(). The basic reason for this is the return type of range() is list and xrange() is xrange() object.
The size allotted using range() is : 80064 The size allotted using xrange() is : 40
As range() returns the list, all the operations that can be applied on the list can be used on it. On the other hand, as xrange() returns the xrange object, operations associated to list cannot be applied on them, hence a disadvantage.
Traceback (most recent call last): File "1f2d94c59aea6aed795b05a19e44474d.py", line 18, in print (x[2:5]) TypeError: sequence index must be integer, not 'slice'
The list after slicing using range is : [3, 4, 5] The list after slicing using xrange is :
Because of the fact that xrange() evaluates only the generator object containing only the values that are required by lazy evaluation, therefore is faster in implementation than range().
- If you want to write code that will run on both Python 2 and Python 3, use range() as the xrange funtion is deprecated in Python 3
- range() is faster if iterating over the same sequence multiple times.
- xrange() has to reconstruct the integer object every time, but range() will have real integer objects. (It will always perform worse in terms of memory however)
This article is contributed by Manjeet Singh. If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article using contribute.geeksforgeeks.org or mail your article to email@example.com. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above.
- Python | range() method
- range() to a list in Python
- Python range() function
- Python | Range duplication in String
- Python | Swapping sublists over given range
- Python | Remove all sublists outside the given range
- Slicing range() function in Python
- Python Pytorch range() method
- Python | Contiguous Boolean Range
- Python | Numbers in a list within a given range
- Python | Delete elements in range
- Python | Count set bits in a range
- Python | range() does not return an iterator
- Python - Filter Range Length Tuples
- Python - Element Index in Range Tuples
- Python | Size Range Combinations in list
- rangev2 - A new version of Python range class
- Python - Incremental Range Initialization in Matrix
- Python | Assign range of elements to List
- Python - Extract range sized strings
Improved By : apurvkolte10