Merge sort is often preferred for sorting a linked list. The slow random-access performance of a linked list makes some other algorithms (such as quicksort) perform poorly, and others (such as heapsort) completely impossible.
Let head be the first node of the linked list to be sorted and headRef be the pointer to head. Note that we need a reference to head in MergeSort() as the below implementation changes next links to sort the linked lists (not data at the nodes), so head node has to be changed if the data at original head is not the smallest value in linked list.
MergeSort(headRef) 1) If head is NULL or there is only one element in the Linked List then return. 2) Else divide the linked list into two halves. FrontBackSplit(head, &a, &b); /* a and b are two halves */ 3) Sort the two halves a and b. MergeSort(a); MergeSort(b); 4) Merge the sorted a and b (using SortedMerge() discussed here) and update the head pointer using headRef. *headRef = SortedMerge(a, b);
Time Complexity: O(n Log n)
Please write comments if you find the above code/algorithm incorrect, or find better ways to solve the same problem.
- Why Quick Sort preferred for Arrays and Merge Sort for Linked Lists?
- Union and Intersection of two linked lists | Set-2 (Using Merge Sort)
- Merge K sorted linked lists | Set 1
- Merge two sorted linked lists
- Merge k sorted linked lists | Set 2 (Using Min Heap)
- In-place Merge two linked lists without changing links of first list
- Merge two sorted linked lists such that merged list is in reverse order
- Merge Sort for Doubly Linked List
- Iterative Merge Sort for Linked List
- Sorted merge of two sorted doubly circular linked lists
- Merge Sort with O(1) extra space merge and O(n lg n) time
- Quick Sort vs Merge Sort
- Merge two sorted lists (in-place)
- 3-way Merge Sort