Difference between Valentina Server and YugabyteDB
1. YugabyteDB :
It is open-source, cloud-native, and high-performance distributed SQL database globally-distributed document store. It aims to make applications agile. Yugabyte is headquartered in Sunnyvale, CA. It is distributed and developed as an Apache 2.0 open source project.
2. Valentina Server :
It is an Object-relational database and reports server and fast object-relational database server. It includes integrated database servers, Valentina Database Server, and SQLite Database Server. It is a full-featured, standards-compliant multi-user access SQLite based database server.
Attention reader! Don’t stop learning now. Get hold of all the important CS Theory concepts for SDE interviews with the CS Theory Course at a student-friendly price and become industry ready.
Difference between Valentina Server and YugabyteDB :
|It is developed by Paradigma Software and initially released on 1994.||It is developed by Yugabyte Inc. and initially released on 2017 and current release on March 2020.|
|Its server operating systems of Valentina Server is Linux, OS X, Windows.||Its server operating systems of YugabyteDB is Linux, OS X.|
|Its primary database model is Relational DBMS.||Its primary database model is Relational DBMS.|
|Absence of Secondary database models in Valentina Server||Secondary database models of YugabyteDB is Document store and Wide column store|
|APIs and other access methods of Valentina Server is ODBC.||It supports YCQL, an SQL-based flexible-schema API with its roots in Cassandra Query Language.|
|It has Data Schema.||Data scheme of YugabyteDB is depending on used data model.|
|It doesn’t has Implementation language-C# .||Implementation language of YugabyteDB is C and C++.|
|Absence of Transaction concepts in Valentina Server.||Its Transaction concepts is Distributed ACID with Serializable & Snapshot Isolation. Inspired by Google Spanner architecture.|
|Absence of Replication methods.||Replication methods of YugabyteDB is based on Raft distributed consensus protocol, minimum 3 replicas for continuous availability.|
|It doesn’t hold Consistency concept.||It has strong consistency on writes and tunable consistency on reads.|