Selenium Testing vs QTP Testing vs Cucumber Testing

Automation testing will ensure you great results because it’s beneficial to increased test coverage. Manual testing used to cover only few test cases at one time as compared to manual testing cover more than that. During automated test cases it’s not all test cases will perform under the tester. Automation testing is the best option out of there.

Selenium Testing:

Selenium is a famous and effective open-supply framework for automating internet browsers. It lets in you to write down scripts in various programming languages like Java, Python, C#, and more to automate interactions with web packages. Selenium is a versatile tool that can be used for a wide range of internet checking out wishes, from basic purposeful assessments to complicated regression and performance trying out. It is broadly used in the software trying out industry and is nicely ideal for take a look at automation in Agile and DevOps environments.

Selenium Testing

QTP Testing:

QTP (Quick Test Professional), also called UFT (Unified Functional Testing), is an industrial test automation tool developed by means of Micro Focus. UFT is mostly used for automating useful and regression checking out of software program programs. Overall, QTP/UFT is a sturdy testing device this is in particular well-ideal for corporations with various testing necessities, which includes each GUI and non-GUI programs. It’s frequently selected by using corporations that require a complete check automation solution and are willing to spend money on a business tool.

Cucumber Testing:

 Cucumber testing is a software testing which uses the tool that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It offers a way to write tests that anybody can understand regardless of their technical knowledge. Test Scenarios are written by the business analyst or product owners, where all behaviour of the system will describe by the POV of the user. it given for the review and sign of by the product owner before the developers can write the code. in Cucumber we can use the Ruby language, the best part Cucumbers is it involves business stakeholders who can’t understand the code properly.

Cucumber Testing

Language support:

• QTP Testing: Net, SAP, Web, Java (Core and Advanced), Stingray 1, Terminal Emulator, PowerBuilder, Windows Mobile, Oracle, Siebel, PeopleSoft, Delphi, Flex, Web Services, Visual Age Smalltalk, WPF, Silverlight and more.
• Selenium Testing: Java, Python, Ruby, C#, JavaScript, Perl, and PHP
• Cucumber Testing: Java, Scala, Ruby, Groovy.

Browser support:

• QTP Testing: Internet Explorer 6,7,8,9,10,11 Edge, and Chromium Edge. Firefox 54-82, Google Chrome till version 86, Safari on Mac OS v11-v14.
• Selenium Testing: Google Chrome 12+, Internet Explorer 7,8,9,10, Safari 5.1+, Opera 11.5, Firefox 3+, Windows, Mac, Linux/Unix.
• Cucumber Testing: It does not provide built-in browser automation, although it does work well with Selenium and WATiR-WebDriver.

Plugins:

• QTP Testing: plugins slower compared to Cucumber and Selenium
• Selenium Testing: plugins slower than Cucumber.
• Cucumber Testing: Plugins work the fastest here.

License cost:

• QTP Testing: Free trial version that you can use for 30 days, after which there are two plans The Runtime Engine plan is available at $2,300 for an annual license. UFT One, the next plan, costs $3,200.
• Selenium Testing: Selenium is an open-source tool.
• Cucumber Testing: There is a free 14-day trial period. The other two plans available are Starter and Cloud which are priced at $28/month and $30.50/month respectively when billed annually. They also have an enterprise plan where you can get a customized solution.

Environment support:

• QTP Testing: Supports both web-based and mobile applications.
• Selenium Testing: It supports only web applications.
• Cucumber Testing: Only web application support is available.

Usage:

• QTP testing: It automates your functional and regression testing.
• Selenium testing: It is used for API, Functional, Regression, Performance Testing, and UI.
• Cucumber testing: It is used for story testing.

Technical support:

• QTP testing: It offers extremely good technical support.
• Selenium testing: There is no official support available since it is an open-source tool. There is a community of users from where you can get regular upgrades and updates.
• Cucumber testing: They offer a great support service, and there is a community to cater to your requests as well.

Selenium testing vs QTP/UFT Testing vs Cucumber Testing:

Selenium	QTP/UFT	Cucumber Testing
Selenium is an open-supply automation checking out framework this is to be had without cost. It provides a variety of tools and libraries to carry out net automation.	QTP/UFT is a business trying out tool evolved via Micro Focus. It requires a paid license for usage.	It uses a behaviour-driven development tool.
Selenium is ordinarily used for net application trying out. It allows you to automate browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and others.	QTP/UFT is versatile and can be used for trying out a variety of programs, together with web, laptop, and cellular applications.	Plugin in cucumber works faster.
Selenium supports more than one programming languages, consisting of Java, Python, C#, and others. You can select your preferred language for test scripting.	QTP/UFT makes use of its proprietary scripting language known as VBScript.	Cucumber Framework supports other language as well beyond Ruby like Java, Scala, Groovy etc.
Selenium helps move-platform checking out, that means you could write scripts on one platform and run them on one of a kind running systems.	QTP/UFT is typically designed for Windows-based environments, which limits its go-platform abilities.	Writing automation steps are joint effort of testers and developer.
Selenium has a big and energetic community of users and contributors. This network help provides a wealth of resources, tutorials, and forums.	QTP/UFT has a smaller user base and much less network-driven help. Support frequently comes from the seller, Micro Focus.	Cucumber can support web environment, database testing, ETL testing in collaboration with any programming languages.
Selenium integrates nicely with Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD) equipment like Jenkins, Travis CI, and others, making it suitable for automated construct and launch pipelines.	QTP/UFT additionally gives CI/CD integrations, but Selenium’s integration skills are extra significant due to its open-source nature.	Cucumber can support web environment, database testing, ETL testing in collaboration with any programming languages.

Conclusion:

The right tool among the three is dependent on the various factors which having several advantages and several disadvantages. when comparing with which is the best with proper way but every tool may have different perspectives. hope so the article make you conclude the difference between among the three testing tools and with your need you can switch to the proper tool as per requirements. you can differentiate the proper comparison between the three amongst tools with the help of given proper information which providing in the article.