A website application goes through a series of changes and updates every minute. The state of the application, therefore, needs constant synchronization. The “state” or the present condition of components ( a web page, a clickable button within the web page) goes through several parent-child components every time an event is triggered.
This complex, cumbersome process called props drilling caused developers several issues regarding data consistency and good user experience.
Explore our handpicked selection of the best 10 alternatives to Redux. From simpler options like Jotai and Zustand to more advanced choices like MobX and Recoil, there’s something for every need.
What is Redux?
What is State Management?
State management refers to the process of handling and coordinating data that changes within an application, particularly regarding its user interface. It’s essentially how you track and update the dynamic aspects of your app.
Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
What is “state” in this context?
State encompasses any data used by your app that can change over time. This could include:
- User input like text in a form or selected options
- Application settings like preferences or themes
- Data fetched from external sources like API responses
- Internal application data like counters or flags
Why is managing state important?
As your app grows, keeping track of state and syncing it across different parts becomes crucial. Poor state management can lead to:
- Inconsistent UI: Different parts of your app showing outdated or conflicting information.
- Bugs and errors: Difficulty tracking down issues related to stale or incorrect data.
- Code complexity: Difficulty maintaining code that manually passes data around the app.
How do you manage state?
There are various approaches to state management, depending on your framework and preferences. Some common strategies include:
- Lifting state up: Passing data through the component tree to a common ancestor.
- Using context providers: Sharing state throughout the app with a centralized “store.”
- State management libraries: Utilizing dedicated libraries like Redux or MobX for complex applications.
Why do you Need a alternative for Redux in React ?
Whether using React, Angular, or Vue; Redux may not be your framework’s most suitable global state management application. While many companies such as Amazon, Twitter, Uber, and Instagram have embraced Redux, it may differ from what your web application requires.
Concerns Associated with Redux
- Adds complexity to simple apps
- Somewhat challenging to grasp and execute
- Writing a lot of boilerplate code makes the code base large and complicated.
- Can have performance issues due to multiple and frequent re-renders
- Even with the Redux Dev tools, debugging may take a lot of work.
Redux Is Not for You If:
- Your app primarily deals with static data.
- Your app follows a simple data flow from a single data source.
- Your application is small, does not perform complex actions, and requires only component-level rendering (no server-side rendering).
Top React Redux Alternatives For State Management
If not Redux, then what? Look no further than this curated list of React Redux alternatives. This compilation will be a definitive guide to help you make a prudent choice regarding state management tools.
According to Jotai Docs, “Jotai was born to solve extra re-render issues in React. It works on an architecture pattern that is different from Redux. Jotai ( Japanese for “State”) uses Atom ( the smallest piece of state that cannot be broken down further.) Atoms hold values -objects and numbers, used to create other state structures.
- Lightweight alternative to manage both global and local states.
- Reduces the quantum of boilerplate code.
- Reactive, automatic re-renders help to keep in sync with the UI.
- More intuitive and supports asynchronous operations.
- A high degree of flexibility because tiny atoms combine to manage large state structures.
- Seamless integration with React.
- The easy setup makes it beginner-friendly.
- Its relative newness means the ecosystem needs to mature.
- Lacks several advanced features.
- The migration path from other libraries like Redux and Recoil is unclear.
Considered the best available competitor to Redux; MobX, unlike Redux, uses Transparent Reactive Functional Reactive Programming (TRFP). When any data that a component refers to change, it triggers automatic re-renders.
- The observable state approach implies that Events trigger Actions. This results in changes in both Derivations and Reactions.
- More than one data storage is used for different purposes.
- Compatible with several Server Side Rendering libraries(SSR)
- Developers with varied experience levels find it easy to use.
- Automation tracks changes in observable data, making it very convenient.
- The availability of 2 data stores, one for UI and the other for domain, makes it possible for developers to reuse the domain in other applications.
- The learning curve can be steep for a beginner in reactive programming.
- Debugging is a lot more complex.
- The state in MobX is mutable, constantly updated with new values, and, therefore, “impure.”
While not a direct alternative to Redux, GraphQL, a query language for Application Programming Interface(APIs), provides an exciting simplification by reducing the volume of data fetched from servers for every query. GraphQL uses a centralized location to manage data and allows the client to fetch only what data it needs.
- Hierarchical Structure with a single endpoint.
- Reducing over-fetching can boost performance.
- Enables Real-time updates.
- Dynamic client-specific querying.
- Efficient data retrieval.
- Strongly defined data typing.
- A growing ecosystem of libraries and tools.
- Does not have built-in security.
- Building a Graph SQL server is complex.
- Inefficient database queries of N+1 query problems can occur.
- Poor optimization of Graph QL queries can strain the server.
One of the front runners in “Battle State Management” is Zustand. It’s a fast, convenient, minimalist API that developers prefer when looking for Redux-like functionality minus the Redux code bulk. Zustand projects its simplicity by illustrating how to create a global state with just four lines of code on its website!
- Zustand uses hooks to integrate with React components.
- Immutability makes it more efficient.
- Zustand has a store within which the state is updated when there are changes in components.
- Comes with Developer Tools for inspection and debugging.
- Efficient in performing asynchronous actions.
- Uses Redux DevTools and can be used as a stand-alone, without React.
- Works remarkably well in the Persisting state with middleware that preserves user data.
- A smaller ecosystem than Redux, so there are fewer tools and smaller libraries.
- May not work well for more extensive applications.
5. React Context
An obvious choice instead of Redux is React Context, which is integrated into React. While it is not precisely an example of a state management system, it finds a place in this list because of its ability to access and pass down data across multiple components.
- Solves the issues related to prop drilling by making data available wherever it needs to be in the app.
- Based on the Provider-consumer model, which makes data accessible by all nested consumers.
- Enables the reuse of components.
- Sharing of data is simpler because prop drilling is not required.
- Context API built into React is efficient for complex operations.
- Ideal for static data that does not go through frequent updates.
- Performance issues, especially if there is an overuse of Context, as a simple change could trigger multiple renders.
- May be unable to pass data between sibling components not part of the React Tree.
- Not very helpful or stable for large, complex projects.
Meta developed it as an answer to state management in React applications. This tool uses less bulky code, has an attractive user interface, and is considered efficient and reliable. It is emerging as a go-to choice for applications with several interdependent components.
- Recoil uses the Atom Model with very minimal boilerplate code.
- Can be used for both global and local state management.
- In-built DevTools to examine and debug the application
- Completely in sync with React.
- Supports and integrates well with React’s Suspense.
- The reactivity model makes it efficient because re-renders are only need-based.
- Flexible and simple.
- Recoil has built-in features such as Asynchronous selectors, Recoil Callback, and Atom Family.
- Large in size, 1.98 MB, as opposed to Redux, which is only 624 MB
- Less battled hardened than veteran Redux
- Smaller and less mature ecosystem
- Does not support middleware
Redux released an enhanced version called Rematch with more features and less code. It boasts of “Automatic IntelliSense,” which is more intuitive. It’s a model-based approach with the developer defining the actions, reducers, and effects.
- Simpler, lighter setup that is only 2KB.
- Not framework-dependent works on Angular, React, Vue, or a browser.
- Allows Plugins like Persist and Loading Plugins.
- Easy integration with Redux libraries, tools, and middleware
- Requires no configuration
- Easy to maintain.
- Built on the Redux concepts, this may prove complex for a beginner
- Not suitable for complex or large applications
- Lightweight, agile, and flexible.
- Compatible with Node.js, React with hooks, and stand-alone without React.
- Localized and on a per-component basis that does not work on a global store principle.
- Integrates well with ReactDev Tools.
- Simple and allows automated re-rendering for changes in state.
- Easy to set up.
- Global state management is not possible.
- Limited features for complex applications.
- Limited ecosystem and fewer community-built tools.
Considered the “mother” of Redux, Meta developed Flux to overcome the limitations of the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture pattern.
- A central dispatcher receives actions through user interactions, triggering a flow of data.
- Multiple stores contain the application state.
- Views or React components update the changes.
- One-way and predictable data flow.
- Centralized Dispatcher for consistency and control.
- Easy Debugging.
- Involves a large amount of code-writing.
- Steep learning curve.
- Not worthwhile for small applications because of the high-cost.
Made specifically to cater to Vue.js, Vuex is a management system considered fast and efficient for highly complex, large projects.
- Unidirectional flow and Predictable state management.
- Uses Getter to retrieve, filter, and store the data, Modules that help organize the store.
- Works on the principle of mutable states where changes can be tracked and logged.
- A single store for the state makes it easy to handle and manage.
- Highly scalable and supports debugging features such as Time Travelling.
- Best for large extensive projects.
- Unsuitable for small applications due to cost.
- Pinia is now the preferred official state management tool for Vue.js.Developers may find it difficult to get fresh updates.
When building web applications in React, managing state effectively is crucial for maintaining a clean, predictable, and scalable codebase. While Redux has long been the go-to solution for complex state management, modern developers increasingly explore alternative libraries offering different strengths and trade-offs.
This article delves into popular Redux alternatives like Jotai, Zustand, and MobX, highlighting their unique features and potential benefits over Redux. We guide you through the decision-making process, considering factors like application size, complexity, desired flexibility, and learning curve.The React landscape is constantly evolving, and it is prudent to always be on the lookout for alternatives that target efficient state management libraries in their applications.
Top 10 Redux Alternatives For State Management – FAQs
Why do we need Redux in React?
Redux enhances React by providing centralized, predictable state management, improving performance and scalability. It simplifies debugging and benefits from a robust community and resources.
Can I replace Redux with context?
Context API suits simple apps or specific states (e.g., themes, auth) but lacks Redux’s advanced features like middleware and structured handling for complex applications.
How do I manage a state without Redux?
Using Redux in React offers centralized state management, predictable updates, improved performance, scalability, debugging benefits, and a large community with extensive resources.
Can React Hooks replace Redux?
Hooks and Redux can work together in a project, with hooks managing component-level state and Redux handling global state. Choose based on your project’s complexity and needs; start with hooks and add Redux if it brings value.
What is the purpose of Redux and why would you use it instead of built in alternatives such as context API?
Share your thoughts in the comments
Please Login to comment...