Skip to content
Related Articles

Related Articles

Recovery from failures in Two Phase Commit Protocol (Distributed Transaction)

Improve Article
Save Article
  • Last Updated : 29 Apr, 2021
Improve Article
Save Article

Prerequisite: Two-Phase Commit Protocol
In the 2-phase commit protocol, the sites contributing to a distributed transaction and the coordinator that is managing the whole transaction globally may fail or crash, and this could lead to the whole transaction failure. Since unanimity is required in order to commit a distributed transaction successfully if any one of the sites fails, so the whole transaction will get aborted.

Following kinds of failures could be encountered in the 2-phase commit protocol:
Failure of contributing siteIf the coordinator(C) detects that a site has crashed, so coordinator takes the following actions:

If the site(Si) has failed before responding with a <ready T> message to Coordinator(C), the coordinator assumes that the site has responded with an <abort T> message.
If the site has failed after sending <ready T> message to C, so the coordinator will ignore the site failure and will execute the rest of the commit protocol in the usual manner.
When the failed site (Si) recovers from failure, so the site will examine its log record in order to know the destiny of the transaction T. whether it has failed or not-

  • If the log contains a <Commit T> record, in this case, the site will execute <redo T>.
  • If the log contains an <abort T> record, in this case, the site executes <undo T>.
  • One most important case, if the log record contains the <ready T>, in this case, the site must contact the Coordinator(C). But, if the C has failed itself then in this case the Site(Si) must consult the neighbouring sites and check their log status whether the transaction(T) has executed or aborted in its absence.
  • If all the sites are unable to give an appropriate response then in this case the Site(Si) must wait for either coordinator recovery or appropriate response of the neighbouring sites.
  • So, Si must enquire periodically about the transaction T fate by sending query messages to other sites.

If the log contains no record (abort, commit, ready) about transaction T, thus we know that Si has failed before responding to <prepare T> message from Ci. Hence, Ci must abort & execute <undo T>.

Failure of Coordinator(Ci)- If the coordinator fails in the midst of the execution of the transaction T in 2-phase commit protocol, then participating sites must decide the destiny of transaction T. In certain cases participating sites can’t decide whether to commit or abort the transaction T and therefore these sites must wait for the recovery of the failed coordinator.

  • If all sites contain a <commit T> record in their log, then T must be commit.
  • If all the site contains a <abort T> record in their log, then T must be abort.
  • If some sites don’t contain <ready T> record in their log, then the failed coordinator(C) can’t decide to commit/abort, so the site has not able to respond to the <prepare T> message of the coordinator hence it’ll be better to abort the transaction rather than waiting.
  • If none of the previous cases holds then all the active site has <ready T> record in their log, but no other record would be found since the coordinator failed it’s impossible to determine whether a decision of commit/abort has been made unless the coordinator(C) recovers. So, all sites have to wait for the recovery of the coordinator. This situation is called the Blocking Problem.  

                                  The solution to the blocking Problem is Three Phase commit Protocol.

Network Partitioning- is nothing but a kind of failure where the network connectivity is split between the partitions or nodes due to a failure. When the network partitioning occurs following two cases may occur:

  • The coordinator and all the participating sites remain in one network partition, then the network failures have an impact on the commit protocol.
  • If all participating sites and coordinator belong to two or more different partitions, so from the viewpoint of the site, the sites whose partition hasn’t the coordinator has failed and starts recovery protocol while the other sites are simply executed whose partition containing the coordinator and follow the usual 2PC protocol.

Reference: Henry_korth

My Personal Notes arrow_drop_up
Related Articles

Start Your Coding Journey Now!