Related Articles

# How to find the highest normal form of a relation

• Difficulty Level : Medium
• Last Updated : 28 Jun, 2021

To understand this topic, you should have a basic idea about Functional Dependency & Candidate keys and Normal forms .

Steps to find the highest normal form of relation:

1. Find all possible candidate keys of the relation.
2. Divide all attributes into two categories: prime attributes and non-prime attributes.
3. Check for 1st normal form then 2nd and so on. If it fails to satisfy the nth normal form condition, the highest normal form will be n-1.

Example 1. Find the highest normal form of a relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with FD set {A->D, B->A, BC->D, AC->BE}

Step 1.   As we can see, (AC)+ ={A, C, B, E, D}  but none of its subsets can determine all attributes of relation, So AC will be the candidate key. A can be derived from B, so we can replace A in AC with B. So BC will also be a candidate key. So there will be two candidate keys {AC, BC}.

Step 2.  The prime attribute is those attribute which is part of candidate key {A, B, C} in this example and others will be non-prime {D, E} in this example.

Step 3.  The relation R is in 1st normal form as a relational DBMS does not allow multi-valued or composite attributes.

The relation is not in the 2nd Normal form because A->D is partial dependency (A which is a subset of candidate key AC is determining non-prime attribute D) and the 2nd normal form does not allow partial dependency.

So the highest normal form will be the 1st Normal Form.

Example 2. Find the highest normal form of a relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with FD set as {BC->D, AC->BE, B->E}

Step 1.   As we can see, (AC)+ ={A,C,B,E,D}  but none of its subsets can determine all attributes of relation, So AC will be the candidate key. A or C can’t be derived from any other attribute of the relation, so there will be only 1 candidate key {AC}.

Step 2.  The prime attribute is those attribute which is part of candidate key {A,C} in this example and others will be non-prime {B,D,E} in this example.

Step 3.  The relation R is in 1st normal form as a relational DBMS does not allow multi-valued or composite attributes.

The relation is in 2nd normal form because BC->D is in 2nd normal form (BC is not a proper subset of candidate key AC) and AC->BE is in 2nd normal form (AC is candidate key) and B->E is in 2nd normal form (B is not a proper subset of candidate key AC).

The relation is not in 3rd normal form because in BC->D (neither BC is a super key nor D is a prime attribute) and in B->E (neither B is a super key nor E is a prime attribute) but to satisfy 3rd normal for, either LHS of an FD should be super key or RHS should be a prime attribute.

So the highest normal form of relation will be the 2nd Normal form.

Example 3. Find the highest normal form of a relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with FD set {B->A, A->C, BC->D, AC->BE}

Step 1.   As we can see, (B)+ ={B,A,C,D,E}, so B will be candidate key. B can be derived from AC using AC->B (Decomposing AC->BE to AC->B and AC->E). So AC will be super key but (C)+ ={C} and (A)+ ={A,C,B,E,D}. So A (subset of AC) will be candidate key. So there will be two candidate keys {A,B}.

Step 2.  The prime attribute is those attribute which is part of candidate key {A,B} in this example and others will be non-prime {C,D,E} in this example.

Step 3.  The relation R is in 1st normal form as a relational DBMS does not allow multi-valued or composite attributes.

The relation is in 2nd normal form because B->A is in 2nd normal form (B is a superkey) and A->C is in 2nd normal form (A is super key) and BC->D is in 2nd normal form (BC is a super key) and AC->BE is in 2nd normal form (AC is a super key).

The relation is in 3rd normal form because the LHS of all FD’s is super keys. The relation is in BCNF as all LHS of all FD’s are super keys. So the highest normal form is BCNF.