Given a text txt[0..n-1] and a pattern pat[0..m-1], write a function search(char pat, char txt) that prints all occurrences of pat in txt. You may assume that n > m.
Input: txt = "THIS IS A TEST TEXT" pat = "TEST" Output: Pattern found at index 10 Input: txt = "AABAACAADAABAABA" pat = "AABA" Output: Pattern found at index 0 Pattern found at index 9 Pattern found at index 12
The Naive String Matching algorithm slides the pattern one by one. After each slide, it one by one checks characters at the current shift and if all characters match then prints the match.
Like the Naive Algorithm, Rabin-Karp algorithm also slides the pattern one by one. But unlike the Naive algorithm, Rabin Karp algorithm matches the hash value of the pattern with the hash value of current substring of text, and if the hash values match then only it starts matching individual characters. So Rabin Karp algorithm needs to calculate hash values for following strings.
1) Pattern itself.
2) All the substrings of text of length m.
Since we need to efficiently calculate hash values for all the substrings of size m of text, we must have a hash function which has following property.
Hash at the next shift must be efficiently computable from the current hash value and next character in text or we can say hash(txt[s+1 .. s+m]) must be efficiently computable from hash(txt[s .. s+m-1]) and txt[s+m] i.e., hash(txt[s+1 .. s+m])= rehash(txt[s+m], hash(txt[s .. s+m-1]) and rehash must be O(1) operation.
The hash function suggested by Rabin and Karp calculates an integer value. The integer value for a string is numeric value of a string. For example, if all possible characters are from 1 to 10, the numeric value of “122” will be 122. The number of possible characters is higher than 10 (256 in general) and pattern length can be large. So the numeric values cannot be practically stored as an integer. Therefore, the numeric value is calculated using modular arithmetic to make sure that the hash values can be stored in an integer variable (can fit in memory words). To do rehashing, we need to take off the most significant digit and add the new least significant digit for in hash value. Rehashing is done using the following formula.
hash( txt[s+1 .. s+m] ) = ( d ( hash( txt[s .. s+m-1]) – txt[s]*h ) + txt[s + m] ) mod q
hash( txt[s .. s+m-1] ) : Hash value at shift s.
hash( txt[s+1 .. s+m] ) : Hash value at next shift (or shift s+1)
d: Number of characters in the alphabet
q: A prime number
Pattern found at index 0 Pattern found at index 10
The average and best case running time of the Rabin-Karp algorithm is O(n+m), but its worst-case time is O(nm). Worst case of Rabin-Karp algorithm occurs when all characters of pattern and text are same as the hash values of all the substrings of txt match with hash value of pat. For example pat = “AAA” and txt = “AAAAAAA”.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above.
- Z algorithm (Linear time pattern searching Algorithm)
- KMP Algorithm for Pattern Searching
- Naive algorithm for Pattern Searching
- Aho-Corasick Algorithm for Pattern Searching
- Optimized Naive Algorithm for Pattern Searching
- Boyer Moore Algorithm for Pattern Searching
- Finite Automata algorithm for Pattern Searching
- Pattern Searching using C++ library
- Pattern Searching using a Trie of all Suffixes
- Pattern Searching using Suffix Tree
- Pattern Searching | Set 6 (Efficient Construction of Finite Automata)
- Suffix Tree Application 2 - Searching All Patterns
- Wildcard Pattern Matching
- Count strings that end with the given pattern
- Program to print Spiral Pattern