“Historic” vs. “Historical”—Which Should I Use?

Answer: Use “historic” for something important in history, and “historical” for something related to or concerning history.

The term “historic” is used to describe something that is significant or important in history. This adjective is reserved for events, places, objects, or people who have made a profound impact on history and are often recognized for their lasting legacy or monumental influence. The emphasis is on the importance and the role something or someone has played in shaping the course of historical events. For example, The moon landing in 1969 was a historic event.

On the other hand, “historical” pertains to anything related to history or the study of the past. This adjective is broader and can be applied to objects, periods, events, or narratives that have a connection to history, without necessarily implying significance or importance. “Historical” simply indicates a relation to history, covering everything from historical records, and historical fiction, to historical research. For example, Historical novels provide insight into life during the Victorian era.

In summary, “historic” emphasizes the importance or significance of something in history, while “historical” refers to anything related to history in a broader sense. If you’re describing a momentous event or occurrence, “historic” is typically the appropriate choice. On the other hand, if you’re discussing general aspects of history or things related to the past without specific importance, “historical” is more suitable.