Given an array **A** of non-negative integers, where . The task is to count number of distinct possible results obtained by taking the bitwise OR of all the elements in all possible Subarrays.

**Examples:**

Input: A = [1, 2] Output: 3 Explanation: The possible subarrays are [1], [2], [1, 2]. These Bitwise OR of subarrays are 1, 2, 3. There are 3 distinct values, so the answer is 3. Input: A = [1, 2, 4] Output: 6 Explanation: The possible distinct values are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7.

**Approach:**

The Naive approach is to generate all possible subarrays and take bitwise OR of all elements in the subarray. Store each result in **set** and return **length of the set**.

**Efficient Approach:**

We can make the above approach better. The Naive approach is to calculate all possible result where, **res(i, j) = A[i] | A[i+1] | … | A[j]**. However we can speed this up by taking note of the fact that **res(i, j+1) = res(i, j) | A[j+1]**. At the **kth** step, say we have all of the **res(i, k)** in some set **pre**. Then we can find the next **pre** set **(for k -> k+1)** by using **res(i, k+1) = res(i, k) | A[k+1]**.

However, the number of unique values in this set **pre** is atmost 32, since the list **res(k, k), res(k-1, k), res(k-2, k), …** is **monotone increasing**, and any subsequent values that are different from previous must have more 1’s in it’s binary representation which can have maximum of **32 ones**.

**Below is the implementation of above approach.**

## Python

`# Python implementation of the above approach ` ` ` `# function to return count of distinct bitwise OR ` `def` `subarrayBitwiseOR(A): ` ` ` ` ` `# res contains distinct values ` ` ` `res ` `=` `set` `() ` ` ` ` ` `pre ` `=` `{` `0` `} ` ` ` ` ` `for` `x ` `in` `A: ` ` ` `pre ` `=` `{x | y ` `for` `y ` `in` `pre} | {x} ` ` ` `res |` `=` `pre ` ` ` ` ` `return` `len` `(res) ` ` ` ` ` `# Driver program ` `A ` `=` `[` `1` `, ` `2` `, ` `4` `] ` ` ` `# print required answer ` `print` `(subarrayBitwiseOR(A)) ` ` ` `# This code is written by ` `# Sanjit_Prasad ` |

*chevron_right*

*filter_none*

Output:

6

**Time Complexity:** O(N*log(K)), where N is the length of A, and K is the maximum size of elements in A.

## Recommended Posts:

- Count subarrays having total distinct elements same as original array
- Sum of bitwise OR of all subarrays
- Sum of Bitwise-OR of all subarrays of a given Array | Set 2
- Number of subarrays have bitwise OR >= K
- Subarrays with distinct elements
- Count subarrays with same even and odd elements
- Count the number of subarrays having a given XOR
- Count subarrays with Prime sum
- Count subarrays with all elements greater than K
- Count Strictly Increasing Subarrays
- Count subarrays with equal number of 1's and 0's
- Count of subarrays whose maximum element is greater than k
- Count subarrays consisting of only 0's and only 1's in a binary array
- Count Subarrays with Consecutive elements differing by 1
- Find the count of Strictly decreasing Subarrays

If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article using contribute.geeksforgeeks.org or mail your article to contribute@geeksforgeeks.org. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks.

Please Improve this article if you find anything incorrect by clicking on the "Improve Article" button below.