Predict the output of following C++ program.
One would expect the output will be same in both the print statements. However, the output will be,
Why the second statement printing 49? Read on the ternary expression.
Ternary Operator (C/C++):
A ternary operator has the following form,
exp1 ? exp2 : exp3
The expression exp1 will be evaluated always. Execution of exp2 and exp3 depends on the outcome of exp1. If the outcome of exp1 is non zero exp2 will be evaluated, otherwise exp3 will be evaluated.
Any side effects of exp1 will be evaluated and updated immediately before executing exp2 or exp3. In other words, there is sequence point after the evaluation of condition in the ternary expression. If either exp2 or exp3 have side effects, only one of them will be evaluated.
It is another interesting fact. The ternary operator has return type. The return type depends on exp2, and convertibility of exp3 into exp2 as per usual\overloaded conversion rules. If they are not convertible, the compiler throws an error. See the examples below,
The following program compiles without any error. The return type of ternary expression is expected to be float (as that of exp2) and exp3 (i.e. literal zero – int type) is implicitly convertible to float.
The following program will not compile, because the compiler is unable to find return type of ternary expression or implicit conversion is unavailable between exp2 (char array) and exp3 (int).
The following program *may* compile, or but fails at runtime. The return type of ternary expression is bounded to type (char *), yet the expression returns int, hence the program fails. Literally, the program tries to print string at 0th address at runtime.
We can observe that exp2 is considered as output type and exp3 will be converted into exp2 at runtime. If the conversion is implicit the compiler inserts stubs for conversion. If the conversion is explicit the compiler throws an error. If any compiler misses to catch such error, the program may fail at runtime.
It is the power of C++ type system that avoids such bugs. Make sure both the expressions exp2 and exp3 return same type or atleast safely convertible types. We can see other idioms like C++ convert union for safe conversion.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above. We will be happy to learn and update from other geeks.
- Conditional or Ternary Operator (?:) in C/C++
- C++ | Nested Ternary Operator
- Implementing ternary operator without any conditional statement
- Program to Find the Largest Number using Ternary Operator
- Why overriding both the global new operator and the class-specific operator is not ambiguous?
- Operator Overloading '<<' and '>>' operator in a linked list class
- Output of C programs | Set 55 (Ternary Operators)
- Interesting Facts about C++
- Interesting Facts in C Programming
- C++ bitset interesting facts
- Interesting facts about C Language
- Some Interesting facts about default arguments in C++
- Interesting Facts about Macros and Preprocessors in C
- Interesting facts about switch statement in C
- Programs to print Interesting Patterns