Use of explicit keyword in C++
Explicit Keyword in C++ is used to mark constructors to not implicitly convert types in C++. It is optional for constructors that take exactly one argument and work on constructors(with a single argument) since those are the only constructors that can be used in typecasting.
Let’s understand explicit keyword through an example.
Predict the output of the following C++ Program
CPP
// C++ program to illustrate default // constructor without 'explicit' // keyword #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Complex { private : double real; double imag; public : // Default constructor Complex( double r = 0.0, double i = 0.0) : real(r), imag(i) { } // A method to compare two // Complex numbers bool operator == (Complex rhs) { return (real == rhs.real && imag == rhs.imag); } }; // Driver Code int main() { // a Complex object Complex com1(3.0, 0.0); if (com1 == 3.0) cout << "Same" ; else cout << "Not Same" ; return 0; } |
Same
As discussed in this article, in C++, if a class has a constructor which can be called with a single argument, then this constructor becomes a conversion constructor because such a constructor allows conversion of the single argument to the class being constructed.
We can avoid such implicit conversions as these may lead to unexpected results. We can make the constructor explicit with the help of an explicit keyword. For example, if we try the following program that uses explicit keywords with a constructor, we get a compilation error.
CPP
// C++ program to illustrate // default constructor with // 'explicit' keyword #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Complex { private : double real; double imag; public : // Default constructor explicit Complex( double r = 0.0, double i = 0.0) : real(r), imag(i) { } // A method to compare two // Complex numbers bool operator == (Complex rhs) { return (real == rhs.real && imag == rhs.imag); } }; // Driver Code int main() { // a Complex object Complex com1(3.0, 0.0); if (com1 == 3.0) cout << "Same" ; else cout << "Not Same" ; return 0; } |
Output
Compiler Error : no match for 'operator==' in 'com1 == 3.0e+0'
We can still typecast the double values to Complex, but now we have to explicitly typecast it. For example, the following program works fine.
CPP
// C++ program to illustrate // default constructor with // 'explicit' keyword #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Complex { private : double real; double imag; public : // Default constructor explicit Complex( double r = 0.0, double i = 0.0): real(r) , imag(i) { } // A method to compare two // Complex numbers bool operator == (Complex rhs) { return (real == rhs.real && imag == rhs.imag); } }; // Driver Code int main() { // a Complex object Complex com1(3.0, 0.0); if (com1 == (Complex)3.0) cout << "Same" ; else cout << "Not Same" ; return 0; } |
Same
Note: The explicit specifier can be used with a constant expression. However, if that constant expression evaluates to true, then only the function is explicit.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above.