Open In App

Memcached vs. Redis

Last Updated : 06 Mar, 2024
Improve
Improve
Like Article
Like
Save
Share
Report

Memcached and Redis are two of the most popular in-memory data stores used for caching and improving the performance of web applications. While both serve similar purposes, they have distinct features and use cases that set them apart. In this article, we’ll compare Memcached and Redis in terms of their features, performance and use cases to help you choose the right solution for your application.

Memcached-vs-Redis

What is Memcached?

Memcached is a high-speed, distributed, in-memory caching system used to speed up dynamic web applications by storing data in memory. It works as a key-value store, where data is accessed using unique keys. Memcached is lightweight, simple to use, and is commonly used for caching database query results, storing session data, and accelerating website performance.

What is Redis?

Redis is an open-source, in-memory data structure store known for its speed and versatility. It can be used as a database, cache, and message broker, and supports various data structures such as strings, lists, sets, and hashes. 

  • Redis is often used in applications requiring high-performance, low-latency access to data, such as real-time analytics, caching, and messaging queues. 
  • Its simplicity, speed, and rich feature set have made it a popular choice among developers.

Memcached vs. Redis

Below are the differences between Memcached and Redis.

Features Memcached Redis
Data Structures Key-Value Store Supports various data structures (strings, lists, etc.)
Data Persistence Does not support data persistence Supports data persistence to disk
Eviction Policies Supports LRU (Least Recently Used) and others Supports multiple eviction policies including LRU, LFU (Least Frequently Used), and others
Transactions Does not support transactions Supports transactions for multiple operations
Pub/Sub Messaging Does not support pub/sub messaging Supports pub/sub messaging
Data Replication Supports replication for high availability Supports replication and clustering for high availability
Scalability Limited scalability options Offers better scalability options, including clustering
Advanced Features Basic functionality Advanced features like pub/sub and transactions

Best Scenarios for Memcached and Redis

MemcachedvsRedis


Like Article
Suggest improvement
Previous
Next
Share your thoughts in the comments

Similar Reads