Open In App

Difference between Recursion and Dynamic Programming

Last Updated : 17 Jan, 2024
Improve
Improve
Like Article
Like
Save
Share
Report

Recursion and Dynamic programming are two effective methods for solving big problems into smaller, more manageable subproblems. Despite their similarities, they differ in some significant ways.

Below is the Difference Between Recursion and Dynamic programming in Tabular format:

Features

Recursion

Dynamic Programming

Definition

By breaking a difficulty down into smaller problems of the same problem, a function calls itself to solve the problem until a specific condition is met.

It is a technique by breaks them into smaller problems and stores the results of these subproblems to avoid repeated calculations.

Approach

Recursion frequently employs a top-down method in which the primary problem is broken down into more manageable subproblems.

Using a bottom-up methodology, dynamic programming starts by resolving the smallest subproblems before moving on to the primary issue.

Base Case

To avoid infinite loops, it is necessary to have a base case (termination condition) that stops the recursion when a certain condition is satisfied.

Although dynamic programming also needs a base case, it focuses mostly on iteratively addressing subproblems.

Performance

Recursion might be slower due to the overhead of function calls and redundant calculations.

Dynamic programming is often faster due to optimized subproblem solving and memoization.

Memory Usage

It does not require extra memory, only requires stack space

Dynamic programming require additional memory to record intermediate results.

Examples

It include computing factorials, using the Fibonacci sequence.

It include computing the nth term of a series using bottom-up methods, the knapsack problem

Let’s take an example: Find out the Nth Fibonacci number

1) Using Recursion:

Below is the code of Fibonacci series using recursion:

C++




#include <iostream>
 
int fibonacci_recursive(int n) {
    if (n <= 1) {
        return n;
    } else {
        return fibonacci_recursive(n - 1) + fibonacci_recursive(n - 2);
    }
}
 
int main() {
    int n = 5;
    int result = fibonacci_recursive(n);
    std::cout << result << std::endl;
    return 0;
}


Java




public class GFG {
    // Recursive function to calculate the nth Fibonacci number
    public static int fibonacciRecursive(int n) {
        if (n <= 1) {
            // Base case: Fibonacci of 0 is 0, and Fibonacci of 1 is 1
            return n;
        } else {
            // Recursively calculate Fibonacci for n-1 and n-2
            return fibonacciRecursive(n - 1) + fibonacciRecursive(n - 2);
        }
    }
 
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int n = 5;
        int result = fibonacciRecursive(n);
 
        System.out.println(result);
    }
}


Python




def fibonacci_recursive(n):
    if n <= 1:
        return n
    else:
        return fibonacci_recursive(n-1) + fibonacci_recursive(n-2)
 
print(fibonacci_recursive(5))


C#




using System;
 
public class Solution
{
    public int FibonacciRecursive(int n)
    {
        if (n <= 1)
        {
            return n;
        }
        else
        {
            return FibonacciRecursive(n - 1) + FibonacciRecursive(n - 2);
        }
    }
 
    static void Main()
    {
        Solution solution = new Solution();
        Console.WriteLine(solution.FibonacciRecursive(5));
    }
}


Javascript




function fibonacciRecursive(n) {
    if (n <= 1) {
        return n;
    } else {
        return fibonacciRecursive(n - 1) + fibonacciRecursive(n - 2);
    }
}
 
const n = 5;
const result = fibonacciRecursive(n);
console.log(result);


Output

5

Time Complexity: O(2n), which is highly inefficient.
Auxiliary Space: Recursion consumes memory on the call stack for each function call, which can also lead to high space complexity. Inefficient recursive algorithms can lead to stack overflow errors.

2) Using Dynamic Programming:

Below is the code of Fibonacci series using Dynamic programming:

C++




#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
 
int fibonacci_dp(int n) {
    std::vector<int> fib(n + 1, 0);
    fib[1] = 1;
 
    for (int i = 2; i <= n; ++i) {
        fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
    }
 
    return fib[n];
}
 
int main() {
    std::cout << fibonacci_dp(5) << std::endl;
 
    return 0;
}


Java




import java.util.Arrays;
 
public class FibonacciDP {
 
    static int fibonacciDP(int n) {
        int[] fib = new int[n + 1];
        fib[1] = 1;
 
        for (int i = 2; i <= n; ++i) {
            fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
        }
 
        return fib[n];
    }
 
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println(fibonacciDP(5));
    }
}


Python




def fibonacci_dp(n):
    fib = [0] * (n + 1)
    fib[1] = 1
    for i in range(2, n + 1):
        fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2]
    return fib[n]
 
print(fibonacci_dp(5))


C#




using System;
 
class Program
{
    // Function to calculate the nth Fibonacci number using dynamic programming
    static int FibonacciDP(int n)
    {
        // Create an array to store Fibonacci numbers
        int[] fib = new int[n + 1];
         
        // Initialize the first two Fibonacci numbers
        fib[1] = 1;
 
        // Calculate Fibonacci numbers from the bottom up
        for (int i = 2; i <= n; ++i)
        {
            fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
        }
 
        // Return the nth Fibonacci number
        return fib[n];
    }
 
    static void Main()
    {
        // Test the FibonacciDP function with n = 5
        Console.WriteLine(FibonacciDP(5));
    }
}


Javascript




function fibonacci_dp(n) {
    const fib = new Array(n + 1).fill(0);
    fib[1] = 1;
 
    for (let i = 2; i <= n; ++i) {
        fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
    }
 
    return fib[n];
}
 
console.log(fibonacci_dp(5));


Output

5

Time Complexity: O(n), a vast improvement over the exponential time complexity of recursion.
Auxiliary Space: DP may have higher space complexity due to the need to store results in a table. In the Fibonacci example, it’s O(n) for the storage of the Fibonacci sequence.

Application of Recursion:

  • Finding the Fibonacci sequence
  • Finding the factorial of a number
  • Binary tree traversals such as in-order, pre-order, and post-order traversals.

Application of Dynamic Programming:

  • Calculation of Fibonacci numbers and storing the results
  • Finding longest subsequences
  • To identify the shortest pathways in graphs, dynamic programming techniques like Dijkstra’s.

Conclusion:

Recursion and dynamic programming both use common problem-solving techniques, although they focus differently on optimisation and memory usage. The nature of the issue and the intended outcome of the solution will determine which option is best.



Like Article
Suggest improvement
Share your thoughts in the comments

Similar Reads