Open In App

Throwing an Exception vs Mono.error() in Spring WebFlux

In Spring Webflux, reactive programming is embraced, introducing concepts like Mono and Flux for asynchronous data handling. In this article, we will learn the differences between throwing exceptions and using Mono.error() in Spring Webflux.

Exceptions and Error Handling in Spring Webflux

Mono.error()




// Assuming MyCustomException is in the same package
import reactor.core.publisher.Mono;
  
public class MonoErrorExample {
  
    public static Mono<String> getData() {
        // Simulate an error scenario
        if (Math.random() < 0.5) {
            return Mono.error(new MyCustomException("Error occurred!"));
        } else {
            return Mono.just("Success!");
        }
    }
  
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        getData()
                .subscribe(
                        data -> System.out.println("Data: " + data),
                        error -> System.err.println("Error: " + error.getMessage())
                );
    }
}

Explanation of the above Program:

Throwing Exceptions

While throwing exceptions can be convenient in imperative programming. It is generally discouraged in Spring Webflux due to several potential drawbacks:

Best Practices for Error Handling in Spring Webflux

Difference between Throwing an Exceptions and Mono.error()

Features

Throwing Exceptions

Mono.error()

Usage

Gives signal errors.

Gives signal errors in reactive streams.

Compatibility

Disrupts reactive flow.

Adheres to Reactive Streams.

Error handling

Limited information, potential resource leaks.

Enables fine-grained error handling, avoids resource leaks.

Operator usage

May bypass operators.

Compatible with reactive operators.

Best practice

Generally discouraged.

Preferred approach in Spring Webflux.


Article Tags :