Burn and minting equilibrium is a situation where the new block creation rate equals the block destruction rate. In this situation, the total supply of blocks is constant. Burn and minting equilibrium is a key feature of blockchain technology that helps ensure the network’s stability. Without this equilibrium, the network would be subject to inflationary or deflationary forces that could destabilize the system.
The following topics of burn and minting algorithms in blockchain will be discussed here:
- What is Burn and Mint Equilibrium?
- Purpose of Burn and Mint Equilibrium.
- Why would anyone Burn Crypto Assets?
- Blockchain Products Implementing BME Model
- Advantages of BME
- Limitations of BME
Let’s start discussing each of these topics in detail.
What is Burn and Mint Equilibrium?
In a burn and mint equilibrium, the total supply of a cryptocurrency is reduced over time as coins are “burned” permanently removed from circulation while new coins are “minted” to offset the loss. The result is a deflationary spiral in which the value of each coin increases as the total supply decreases.
- This encourages hoarding and drives up the price of the remaining coins, making them even more valuable.
- The burn and mint equilibrium is a key feature of many cryptocurrencies, including Factom, HNT, etc.
- It is designed to create a scarce, valuable asset that cannot be easily created or destroyed.
- The burn and mint process also helps to secure the network by making it more expensive to mount a 51% attack.
- In a burn and mint equilibrium, the incentives are aligned so that holders of the currency have an incentive to hold onto their coins and not spend them. This can create a virtuous circle in which holders are rewarded for their patience and the currency becomes more valuable over time.
- It can also lead to economic stagnation as people hoarding the currency refuse to spend it, leading to a lack of demand.
- The burn and mint equilibrium is a controversial feature of some cryptocurrencies and is not without its critics.
- Some argue that it is a form of artificial scarcity that does not reflect the true underlying value of the currency.
- Others argue that a necessary evil is required to create a valuable, scarce asset.
Purpose of Burn and Mint Equilibrium
The purpose of burn and mint equilibrium is to ensure that the supply of a currency is in equilibrium with the demand for that currency, so it ensures that the total supply of a cryptocurrency is constant. . This is done by “burning” (destroying) a certain amount of the currency each time it is traded, and “minting” (creating) new units of the currency to replace the ones that were burned. This system helps to control the money supply and keep the price of the currency stable.
Why would anyone Burn Crypto Assets?
The most likely reason for burning crypto assets is to destroy them so that they cannot be used again. This could be done for a variety of reasons:
- To prevent them from being stolen.
- To prevent them from being used to launder money.
- For example, they may want to get rid of them because they no longer believe in the project, or they may need to free up some cash.
Burning crypto assets is a way to permanently remove them from circulation.
Blockchain Products Implementing BME Model
There are many blockchain products that implement the BME Model. Some of the more popular ones include Factom, Sriptarnica, and CHR. These products all use a blockchain to store data and transactions.
- Factom: The factom tokens are burnt by the users to use the service. the protocol mints 73,000 new tokens every month and distributed them to the validators.
- Scriptarnica: It is a decentralized blockchain-based platform that implements the BME model. This platform is used for reading, writing, publishing, buying, and selling e-books. The book’s prices are in CHR tokens that are tied to USD, thus keeping the price of the books constant.
- CHR: The users get CHR tokens by burning the SCRIPT tokens, while minted SCRIPT tokens are distributed to all service providers. These are non-transferable tokens.
- Helium: This is a decentralized, open wireless blockchain platform that uses the BME model. The Helium Token (HNT) is the native cryptocurrency of the Helium network. The Data Credit (DC) is produced by burning HNT. The BME model here intends to allow for the supply of HNT to respond to network usage trends.
Applications of BME
- Sustainable economic system: Burn and minting equilibrium can be used to create a sustainable economic system in which the demand for that currency regulates the supply of a currency.
- Stable currency prize: By burning currency when it is in excess supply and minting new currency when there is increased demand, the system can help stabilize the currency’s price.
- Deflationary currency: They can be used to create a deflationary or inflationary currency, depending on the specific parameters of the system.
-
Create currency: They can be used to create a currency that is:
- Not subject to central bank manipulation.
- Not subject to government control.
- Not subject to inflationary pressures.
- Not subject to deflationary pressures.
- Not subject to political manipulation.
- Not subject to hyperinflation.
- Not subject to the financial crisis.
- Not subject to economic collapse.
- Currency maintains purchasing power: They can help to ensure that a currency maintains its purchasing power over time.
Advantages of BME
- Stable and healthy blockchain network: Minting equilibrium is a key concept in blockchain that refers to the situation where the rate of new block creation is equal to the rate of block destruction. This situation results in a stable and healthy blockchain network without inflation or deflation.
- More efficient and secure blockchain network: In a burn and mint equilibrium, miners do not need to keep creating new blocks because a constant stream of blocks is created and destroyed. It results in a more efficient and secure blockchain network as no extra blocks are being created that could potentially be attacked.
- More decentralized network: A burn and mint equilibrium also lead to a more decentralized network as there is no need for a central authority to control the block creation process.
- Results in lower transaction fees: This situation is also beneficial for users as it results in lower transaction fees as there is no need to pay miners to create new blocks.
- The network is also more secure: In a burn and mint equilibrium, the network is also more secure as all blocks are continuously verified and there is no need to wait for a new block to be created to verify transactions.
- More scalable blockchain network: This setup also allows for a more scalable blockchain network as the number of blocks being created is limited by the number of blocks being destroyed.
- Reduced energy consumption: A burn and mint equilibrium are also beneficial for the environment as it results in reduced energy consumption as there is no need to power miners to create new blocks.
- All users have an equal opportunity: This type of equilibrium is also fairer as all users have an equal opportunity to mint new blocks without needing specialized hardware or software.
- More resilient to forks: Finally, a burn and mint equilibrium are also more resilient to forks as all blocks are continuously verified and there is no need to wait for a new block to be created to verify transactions.
Limitations of BME
- Take time and slow down the process: All parties involved must verify transactions on a blockchain, which can take time and slow down the process.
- Expensive to maintain: Blockchains are often expensive to maintain.
- Difficult to track criminals: The anonymity of users on a blockchain can make it difficult to track criminals.
- Difficult to search: Blockchains are often used to store large amounts of data, making them difficult to search.
- Leading to permanent mistakes: The immutability of blockchains means that once data is written to the blockchain, it cannot be changed, leading to permanent mistakes.
- More resilient to attacks: The decentralized nature of blockchains means there is no single point of failure, making them more resilient to attacks.
- Slow to adapt to change: Blockchains are often slow to adapt to change.
- Leading to decisions being made slowly: The decentralized nature of blockchains means there is no central authority to make decisions, leading to decisions being made slowly.