Choosing between a time-series database and a relational database isn’t merely a matter of data storage location. It’s pivotal for shaping your organization’s data handling practices — it’s about enhancing how you extract insights from your data. This decision significantly impacts speed, efficiency, and the precision of your operations.
Consider the potential: smoother operations, swifter decision-making, and a competitive edge in your sector. This is the influence of selecting the correct database. However, to maximize its services, it’s important to understand the differences between these databases and leverage their different strengths to your benefit.
This article gives you a brief discussion between time series databases and relational databases. We will try to keep it simple, breaking down the terms and helping you choose the right option for your requirements.
What is a Time Series Database?
Time-series databases are designed for storing, accessing, and examining data points categorized by time. They excel in managing time-stamped or time-series data derived from sensors, IoT devices, server metrics, financial market data, and any other time-sensitive information.
Time-series databases offer specialized features and structures designed for time-series data. These functionalities facilitate swift data inserts, effective time-based inquiries, and the downsampling/aggregation of data across time intervals.
What is a Relational Database?
Relational data, as its name suggests, refers to data that showcases relationships between different elements. Its core objective is to uphold precise documentation of objects and their interconnections with one another. This type of data is dynamic and subject to frequent updates to ensure ongoing accuracy.
Relational databases serve as versatile solutions for storing and retrieving various types of data. They structure data into tables composed of rows and columns, employing SQL (Structured Query Language) for data querying and management. They are widely used in different applications where data integrity, ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) observation, and complex querying abilities are required, like eCommerce, finance, and traditional business applications.
Time Series Database vs Relational Database: Top Differences
Understanding the key differences between these two database types is essential for making an informed decision about which one best suits your needs. We’ll break down the eight key areas where time series databases and relational databases diverge:
1. Data Structure
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases mainly organize data around timestamps, storing sequences of data points gathered over time. Unlike traditional databases with diverse data types, they emphasize timestamps as primary identifiers. These databases adeptly manage time-stamped entries such as sensor readings, financial market data, or logs.
Time-series databases don’t require a fixed schema like relational databases. Instead, they focus on swiftly retrieving and analyzing time-based data. Their setup emphasizes arranging data points chronologically, facilitating efficient retrieval and analysis of time-stamped information.
Relational Database:
In relational databases, data is arranged into tables, which are formed of rows and columns. Each row defines individual data entries or records, while columns define the types of data they can hold, such as integers, strings, dates, or floating-point numbers.
In databases like these, a schema is used to set up how tables are structured and connected. Take, for example, tables for customers and their orders. In a relational database, primary and foreign keys are used to tie these tables together. This keeps the data reliable and helps with searching for related information.
2. Performance
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases outperform others in handling time-based queries, such as fetching data within defined periods, aggregating data over intervals, or studying historical trends. Their performance stays steady despite the increasing volume of time-stamped data, thanks to their structured and optimized design tailored for this purpose.
Time-series databases stand out due to their optimized storage methods and specialized data structures, such as employing append-only storage and compression techniques. Furthermore, they utilize specific indexing methods like inverted indexes or bitmap indexes to swiftly access time-oriented data.
Relational Database:
Relational databases are designed for transactional operations and complex queries with structured data. They’re proficient in managing different query types across tables and maintaining data integrity through normalization and relationship enforcement.
Yet, managing extensive time-stamped or time-series data can lead to performance degradation in relational databases. Queries dealing with large datasets, particularly those with intricate Join operations across multiple tables or extensive aggregations, may encounter delays.
With growing data volumes, relational databases may experience decreased query speed and responsiveness unless they’re finely tuned, indexed, and tailored for particular use cases.
3. Data Modelling
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases adopt a versatile data modeling approach, focusing on enhancing storage and query efficiency for time-stamped data. They utilize specialized data structures, such as compressed or indexed representations, to effectively manage chronological data.
Time-series databases offer schema-on-write data collection and low latency. This flexibility enables smoother scalability and the capacity to store diverse data types with minimal adjustments to the database structure.
Relational Database:
Relational databases operate based on structured data modeling. They utilize schemas to specify tables, columns, relationships, and constraints for data organization and management. The schema defines the data structure to be stored, enabling intricate querying and advanced data analysis through relational algebra operations.
The strict schema imposes regulations on the types of data permissible in each field and the interconnections between different tables via keys. This modeling strategy upholds data integrity and consistency through constraints, keys, and normalization techniques such as 1NF, 2NF, 3NF, and so forth. Queries involving interconnected tables are executed through JOIN operations.
4. Optimization
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases shine in handling vast amounts of sequential data points and historical data. To streamline the management of time-series data, these databases integrate specialized storage engines and compression methods to effectively store sequences of time-stamped entries.
They structure data to expedite the retrieval and analysis of historical data points, emphasizing swift access to time-oriented information over relational structures’ complexity. Time-series databases utilize compression algorithms tailored for time-series data to reduce storage requirements while preserving fast access to historical data points.
Relational Database:
Relational databases prioritize efficient storage and recovery of structured data with complex relationships, often highlighting transactional integrity and the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability) effects. They employ indexing, caching, and query optimization methods to boost performance.
Indexes organize data in sorted structures based on designated columns to accelerate lookup operations and enhance data retrieval speed. Additionally, caching mechanisms store regularly accessed data in memory, reducing the necessity to repeatedly retrieve information from disk storage.
Relational databases employ query optimizers to scrutinize SQL queries and ascertain the most effective execution plan, taking into account elements such as data distribution, table sizes, and existing indexes.
5. Scalability
Time Series Database:
In contrast, time-series databases prioritize scalability, particularly given the unique characteristics of time-series data. Their design facilitates horizontal scaling through the distribution of data across nodes or clusters. Consequently, they can manage increased data volumes and accommodate a greater number of simultaneous read and write operations.
Relational Database:
Relational databases have traditionally encountered difficulties in expanding horizontally due to their emphasis on preserving data integrity and consistency across diverse tables. As the volume of data stored in relational databases additions, horizontal scaling—distributing the database workload across multiple servers—poses challenges in supporting ACID properties and ensuring data coherence.
Although vertical scaling (increasing the resources of a single server) is a typical process for improving performance, it has controls regarding the amount of data a single server can manage.
6. Maintenance and Management
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases are designed to streamline upkeep and administration. They incorporate built-in capabilities for automatically removing or archiving older data points. This functionality minimizes the need for manual intervention in managing the data lifecycle.
Furthermore, due to their specialized architecture, time-series databases are crafted to accommodate high rates of data ingestion. They employ compression methods and optimized storage formats to alleviate pressure on storage systems, simplifying the management and maintenance of large influxes of data.
Time series databases are customized for managing time series data, thereby decreasing maintenance intricacies. They provide functionalities such as data synchronization and scalable capabilities, thereby diminishing the necessity for manual intervention.
Relational Database:
Maintaining relational databases usually entails structured upkeep routines due to their intricate schema and interrelations. Database administrators (DBAs) undertake responsibilities such as schema modifications, index enhancements, and query fine-tuning to guarantee peak performance. Consistent backups, updates, and patches are essential for upholding data consistency and security.
Additionally, managing historical data within relational databases can pose challenges, particularly when handling extensive volumes of archived data. The size of the database can substantially affect performance and necessitate tactics such as partitioning or archiving older data to effectively handle database size.
Managing time series data in relational databases often demands continuous manual upkeep, encompassing tasks such as data retention, indexing, and performance tuning. This heightened complexity often mandates dedicated personnel to handle these responsibilities.
7. Storage Efficiency
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases commonly employ strategies such as data compression, downsampling, and optimized storage formats to reduce storage requirements while managing extensive volumes of time-series data. By concentrating on sequential data points, these databases streamline storage, prioritizing the storage and retrieval of data based on timestamps.
Furthermore, time-series databases utilize techniques such as tiered storage, organizing data into different tiers according to its significance or frequency of access. This method enhances storage efficiency by assigning high-performance storage to frequently accessed data and employing more economical storage for less accessed information.
Relational Database:
Relational databases organize data in tables, potentially resulting in redundant storage of similar information across multiple tables. While normalization enhances data consistency and decreases redundancy, it can also lead to higher storage demands.
Moreover, indexing and other optimization methods in relational databases consume extra storage capacity to facilitate quicker query processing.
8. Data Retention
Time Series Database:
Time-series databases are prepared with inherent abilities for enacting data retention approaches, either based on time intervals or predefined standards. They provide functionalities to automatically remove or archive older data points, ensuring efficient management of the lifecycle of time-series data within the database.
Time-series databases additionally integrate approaches where data points are aggregated or summarized within time intervals, diminishing storage demands while preserving crucial details. Certain time-series databases offer customizable retention policies, enabling users to establish rules for retaining or purging data according to personalized criteria.
Relational Database:
In relational databases, data retention approaches typically hinge on particular business needs or regulatory guidelines. Typically, data in relational databases remains stored for extended periods, occasionally indefinitely, unless intentionally removed or archived. Implementing retention policies or archiving outdated data often necessitates manual intervention and scripting to migrate or delete older records.
Due to the structured normalization and intricate connections, determining which data to keep and for how long can pose challenges. With the expansion of data volumes, preserving extensive historical data in relational databases results in performance deterioration and heightened storage expenses.
Time Series Database vs Relational Database: Difference Table
| Aspects | Time Series Database | Relational Database |
|---|---|---|
| Data Structure | Organized by timestamps, sequences of data points | Structured in tables with rows and columns |
| Schema | Flexible, schema-on-write | Rigid, predefined schema |
| Performance | Optimized for time-based queries | May struggle with large time-series data |
| Data Modeling | Focuses on efficient storage/retrieval of time data | Uses structured modeling with relationships |
| Optimization | Tailored for sequential data and historical data | Prioritizes transactional integrity (ACID) |
| Scalability | Scales horizontally for vast data volumes | Horizontal scaling challenges due to ACID |
| Maintenance | Designed for simplified maintenance | Requires structured upkeep routines (DBAs) |
| Storage Efficiency | Uses compression, downsampling, tiered storage | May have redundant data storage |
| Data Retention | Built-in mechanisms for data retention policies | Requires manual intervention for archiving/deletion |
Must Read:
Conclusion
In this article, we have delivered a brief comparison between time series databases and relational databases. However, when it comes to defining the optimal choice between the two, the answer is not always clear. The decision depends on comprehending your data requirements and how your applications will engage with it.
Take into consideration the characteristics of your data—its format, size, speed, and diversity. Assess the requirement for real-time analysis, scalability, and the frequency of data updates. Align these factors with the advantages of each type of database.