The Pitts India Act of 1784

Pitt’s India Act was passed in August 1784. The design was to eliminate absconds in the Regulating Act. Its fundamental arrangement was something very similar. The organization’s public undertakings and its organization in India were to come straightforwardly under preeminent control of the British Government. The right of the Company to regional belongings was anyway not contacted, so it basically implied a split the difference.

The Act laid out a Board of Control comprising six commissioners, including, two Cabinet clergymen. The Board of Control was to guide and control crafted by the Court of Directors and the Government of India. They were to control all matters of common and military Governor of the British regions in India.’ A confidential advisory group comprising three Directors was named to replace the Court ‘ of Directors in political and military matters. 

The Constitution of the  East India Company’s administration in India was overhauled. The Act laid out the rule that the public authority of India is set under the Governor General and a Council of three so that if by some stroke of good luck one individual from the Council upheld him, he could have his direction. The Governor General was given a making choice. The Act obviously expressed that the Presidencies of Madras and Bombay were to be subordinate to the Presidency of Bengal in all issues of war, strategic relations furthermore, income

Objective

Pitt’s India Act placed the East India Company under British government control in India in an effort to overcome the shortcomings of the 1773 Regulating Act. The East India Company’s political and business activities were separated by the Pitts India Act of 1784. The Company’s public initiatives and organizations in India were the only ones subject to extensive government scrutiny. The Board of Control was designed to aid in a situation quite similar to this.

The members of this Board of Control are:

• The King has designated six authorities, including the Secretary of State, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and four Privy Councilors.
• The President of the Board of Control was chosen to be the Secretary of State.
• In this dual system of control, the Board of Control spoke to the British government and the Court of Directors spoke to the Company.
• All friendly and military authorities were required, within two months of joining, to announce their resources in India and the United Kingdom.
• There are now only three people in the General Assembly’s Governor-chamber. One of the three individuals would serve as the military commander-in-chief for the British Crown in India.
• The Governor-General was given the authority to blackball.
• Administrations in Madras and Bombay submitted to the Bengal Presidency. The capital of the British Indian states was actually Calcutta.

Specialists gave to the Board of Directors as indicated through Pitts Act,1784. The governing physique was once allowed completed admittance to the organization’s records. It had the strength to ship Governors to India and to alternate them. The Court of Directors must tackle the organization, and the Board of Control must tackle the Crown. In the span of two months of taking up their posts, all thoughtful army officers of the East India Company have been requested to furnish the Court of Directors with a full inventory of their property in India and in Britain.Specified severe self-discipline for degenerate authorities. The charter laid out via Pitt’s India Act remained to a super extent unaltered for the relaxation of the organization’s preferred in India in 1858.

Significance

There were significant two changes seen in the constitution of the organization with the section of the Pitt’s India Act, they were:

• The committees of Madras and Bombay were altered on the model of the Bengal Council.
• The individuals from the Executive committee were diminished 3 while the Commander-in-head of this leader chamber was the Governor-General himself.
• A different division, known as the Board of Control, was being comprised in England to control the strategies of the Court of Directors.
• Presentation of double government that is by the organization as well as by the Parliament. This arrangement of government endured till 1858.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1: Why Pitt’s India Act was passed?

Answer:

Pitt’s India Act of 1784 was passed to eliminate the deformities of the Regulating Act of 1773. It separated the business and political issues of the Company. In this manner it laid out an arrangement of twofold government in India by the Crown in Great Britain and the British East India Company.

Question 2: What is the main change brought by Pitt’s India Act?

Answer:

Pitt’s India Act got significant changes to the constitution of the Company. It comprised a branch of state in England, otherwise called the Board of Control, whose reason controlled the strategy of the Court of Directors, presenting the Dual System of Government.

Question 3: What was the result of Pitt’s Act in 1784?

Answer:

Pitts India Act 1784, otherwise called the East India Company Act 1784, was passed in the British Parliament to address the blemishes in the Regulating Act 1773. Subsequently, the Crown in Great Britain and the British East India Company had double control or joint government in India, with the Crown having extreme power.