Consider a devotee wishing to give offerings to temples along a mountain range. The temples are located in a row at different heights. Each temple should receive at least one offering. If two adjacent temples are at different altitudes, then the temple that is higher up should receive more offerings than the one that is lower down. If two adjacent temples are at the same height, then their offerings relative to each other does not matter. Given the number of temples and the heights of the temples in order, find the minimum number of offerings to bring.
Input : 3 1 2 2 Output : 4 All temples must receive at-least one offering. Now, the second temple is at a higher altitude compared to the first one. Thus it receives one extra offering. The second temple and third temple are at the same height, so we do not need to modify the offerings. Offerings given are therefore: 1, 2, 1 giving a total of 4. Input : 6 1 4 3 6 2 1 Output : 10 We can distribute the offerings in the following way, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1. The second temple has to receive more offerings than the first due to its height being higher. The fourth must receive more than the fifth, which in turn must receive more than the sixth. Thus the total becomes 10.
We notice that each temple can either be above, below, or at the same level as the temple next to it. The offerings required at each temple is equal to the maximum length of the chain of temples at lower height as shown in the image.
To follow the given rule, a temple must be offered at least x+1 where x is maximum of following two.
- Number of temples on left in increasing order.
- Number of temples on right in increasing order.
A naive method of solving this problem would be for each temple, go to the left until altitude increases, and do the same for the right.
Time complexity: O(n2)
Space complexity: O(1)
Dynamic Programming Approach
By using Dynamic Programming, we can improve the time complexity. In this method, we create a structure of length n which maintains the maximum decreasing chain to the left of each temple and the maximum decreasing chain to the right of each temple. We go through once from 0 to N setting the value of left for each temple. We then go from N to 0 setting the value of right for each temple. We then compare the two and pick the maximum for each temple.
Time complexity: O(n)
Space complexity: O(n)
This article is contributed by Aditya Kamath. If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article using contribute.geeksforgeeks.org or mail your article to email@example.com. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks.
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above.
- Greedy approach vs Dynamic programming
- Generate all unique partitions of an integer | Set 2
- Queries for bitwise OR in the given matrix
- Queries for bitwise AND in the given matrix
- Queries for bitwise AND in the index range [L, R] of the given array
- Queries for bitwise OR in the index range [L, R] of the given array
- Distinct palindromic sub-strings of the given string using Dynamic Programming
- Maximum sum such that no two elements are adjacent | Set 2
- Minimize the number of steps required to reach the end of the array
- Number of ways to reach the end of matrix with non-zero AND value
- Find minimum steps required to reach the end of a matrix | Set 2
- Find minimum steps required to reach the end of a matrix | Set - 1
- Optimal Strategy for a Game | Set 2
- Minimum number of sub-strings of a string such that all are power of 5