In what ways was the administration of the Company different from Indian Rulers?

The administration which was present of the Company was very different from that of Indian rulers in the methods of administration in which, British territories were divided into separate administrative units, known as the “presidencies”. The three important presidencies include Bengal, Madras, and Bombay.

Administration of Company different from Indian Rulers

The Company partitioned its managerial units called Presidencies. There were three Presidencies – Bengal, Madras, and Bombay. In India, the locale was the super managerial unit. Every administration was controlled by a Governor. Locale were managed by the Collectors. The incomparable top of the organization of the Company was the Governor-General. Yet, in India, the top of the organization was the ruler. The fundamental occupation of the Governor-General was to present authoritative changes while the primary occupation of the Collector was to gather income and charges and keep up with the rule of law in his region.

• The last strong ruler was Aurangzeb. A huge piece of An Indian area was under him.
• Numerous large zamindars and Mughal lead representatives (subadars) started laying out provincial realms and affirming their position, after the demise of Aurangzeb in 1707.
• Administrations were the authoritative units of British regions in India. Bombay, Madras, and Bengal were the three Presidencies.
• To run these Presidencies, there was a Governor. In the organization, the Governor-General was the Supreme Head.
• In the circle of Justice, the main Governor-General (Warren Hastings) executed different regulatory changes, especially in the area of Justice.
• Another arrangement of equity was presented in 1772. They made two courts for each region – Diwani Adalat (a common court) and Faujdar Adalat (a lawbreaker court).
• The common courts were managed by European region authorities; the Hindu Pandits and Maulvis helped them in deciphering Indian regulations.
• Under the oversight of the gatherers, the lawbreaker courts were still under a mufti and Qazi.

Related Links

1. Policies of British rulers which exploited Indian Economy
2. Economic Policies of British in India
3. East India Company in India

FAQs on the Administration of Company different from Indian Rulers

Q 1. In what ways the Administration of the Company was different from the Indian Rulers?

Answer-

The administration of the Company was quite different from the Indian rulers as the administrative divisions during East India Company rule were called the “Presidencies” and the territories under British rule were divided on that for better and more effective governance.

Q 2. When was the Supreme Court established in India?

Answer-

Under the Regulating Act of 1773 in Calcutta, the Supreme Court was established and most of the cases at that time were related to Bihar, Odisha as well as Bengal.

Q 3. What was the Indian administration during the British period?

Answer-

The Indian Administration during the British period, was a set of policies which made by the administrative structure in India, the Cornwallis or Bengal system, which gave legal shape to Lord Cornwallis, governor-general of India.