A Vectors in C++ can resize itself when more elements are added. It also allows deletion of elements. A basic idea is to double the array whenever it becomes full. However the actual library implementation may be more complex. If we create a new double sized array whenever current array becomes full (or it is about to become full), and copy current elements to new double sized array, we get amortized time complexity as O(1). So a particular insert operation may be costly, but overall time complexity remains O(1). Please refer Analysis of Algorithm | Set 5 (Amortized Analysis Introduction) for proof. So time complexity of push_back() is O(1).
1 2 3 4 5 6
What is the time complexity of erase() in vector()?
Since erasing an element requires moving other elements (to ensure random access), time complexity of erase is O(1).
2 3 4 5
- vector::push_back() and vector::pop_back() in C++ STL
- vector::crend() & vector::crbegin() with example
- vector::front() and vector::back() in C++ STL
- vector::empty() and vector::size() in C++ STL
- vector :: cbegin() and vector :: cend() in C++ STL
- Does overloading work with Inheritance?
- How does Duff's Device work?
- vector::begin() and vector::end() in C++ STL
- vector::at() and vector::swap() in C++ STL
- Minimum number of days required to complete the work
- Vector in C++ STL
- Deque vs Vector in C++ STL
- Modifiers for Vector in C++ STL
- vector :: assign() in C++ STL
- vector::emplace_back in C++ STL
If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article using contribute.geeksforgeeks.org or mail your article to firstname.lastname@example.org. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks.
Please Improve this article if you find anything incorrect by clicking on the "Improve Article" button below.