Gradient Descent is an optimization algorithm used for minimizing the cost function in various machine learning algorithms. It is basically used for updating the parameters of the learning model.

**Types of gradient Descent:**

**Batch Gradient Descent:**This is a type of gradient descent which processes all the training examples for each iteration of gradient descent. But if the number of training examples is large, then batch gradient descent is computationally very expensive. Hence if the number of training examples is large, then batch gradient descent is not preferred. Instead, we prefer to use stochastic gradient descent or mini-batch gradient descent.**Stochastic Gradient Descent:**This is a type of gradient descent which processes 1 training example per iteration. Hence, the parameters are being updated even after one iteration in which only a single example has been processed. Hence this is quite faster than batch gradient descent. But again, when the number of training examples is large, even then it processes only one example which can be additional overhead for the system as the number of iterations will be quite large.**Mini Batch gradient descent:**This is a type of gradient descent which works faster than both batch gradient descent and stochastic gradient descent. Here*b*examples where*b<m*are processed per iteration. So even if the number of training examples is large, it is processed in batches of b training examples in one go. Thus, it works for larger training examples and that too with lesser number of iterations.**Variables used:**

Let m be the number of training examples.

Let n be the number of features.**Note:**if b == m, then mini batch gradient descent will behave similarly to batch gradient descent.**Algorithm for batch gradient descent :**

Let h_{θ}(x) be the hypothesis for linear regression. Then, the cost function is given by:

Let Σ represents the sum of all training examples from i=1 to m.J

_{train}(θ) = (1/2m) Σ( h_{θ}(x^{(i)}) - y^{(i)})^{2}Repeat { θj = θj – (learning rate/m) * Σ( h_{θ}(x^{(i)}) - y^{(i)})x_{j}^{(i)}For every j =0 …n }Where x

_{j}^{(i)}Represents the j^{th}feature of the i^{th}training example. So if*m*is very large(e.g. 5 million training samples), then it takes hours or even days to converge to the global minimum.That’s why for large datasets, it is not recommended to use batch gradient descent as it slows down the learning.**Algorithm for stochastic gradient descent:**

1) Randomly shuffle the data set so that the parameters can be trained evenly for each type of data.

2) As mentioned above, it takes into consideration one example per iteration.Hence, Let (x

^{(i)},y^{(i)}) be the training example Cost(θ, (x^{(i)},y^{(i)})) = (1/2) Σ( hθ(x^{(i)}) - y^{(i)})^{2}J_{train}(θ) = (1/m) Σ Cost(θ, (x^{(i)},y^{(i)})) Repeat { For i=1 to m{ θ_{j}= θ_{j}– (learning rate) * Σ( h_{θ}(x^{(i)}) - y^{(i)})x_{j}^{(i)}For every j =0 …n } }**Algorithm for mini batch gradient descent:**

Say b be the no of examples in one batch, where b < m.

Assume b = 10, m = 100;**Note:**However we can adjust the batch size. It is generally kept as power of 2. The reason behind it is because some hardware such as GPUs achieve better run time with common batch sizes such as power of 2.Repeat { For i=1,11, 21,…..,91 Let Σ be the summation from i to i+9 represented by k. θ

_{j}= θ_{j}– (learning rate/size of (b) ) * Σ( h_{θ}(x^{(k)}) - y^{(k)})x_{j}^{(k)}For every j =0 …n }**Convergence trends in different variants of Gradient Descents:**In case of Batch Gradient Descent, the algorithm follows a straight path towards the minimum. If the cost function is convex, then it converges to a global minimum and if the cost function is not convex, then it converges to a local minimum. Here the learning rate is typically held constant.

In case of stochastic gradient Descent and mini-batch gradient descent, the algorithm does not converge but keeps on fluctuating around the global minimum. Therefore in order to make it converge, we have to slowly change the learning rate. However the convergence of Stochastic gradient descent is much noisier as in one iteration, it processes only one training example.