Skip to content
Related Articles

Related Articles

Improve Article
GATE | GATE-CS-2016 (Set 1) | Question 8
  • Last Updated : 12 Feb, 2016

Consider the following statements relating to the level of poker play of four players P, Q, R, and S.

I    P always beats Q
II.  R always beats S
III. S loses to P only sometimes
IV.  R always loses to Q 

Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above statements?

(i) P is likely to beat all the three other players
(ii) S is the absolute worst player in the set 

(A) (i) only
(B) (ii) only
(C) (i) and (ii)
(D) neither (i) nor (ii)


Answer: (D)

Explanation: All three can Beat S, but S loses to P only sometimes. So, (ii) can not be inferred from the given statements.

Defeating in Poker is not transitive. P beats Q. Q beats R and R beats S. Yet S loses to P only sometimes, meaning that S mostly wins against P. So we can not logically infer that P is likely to beat R.

Quiz of this Question

Attention reader! Don’t stop learning now. Learn all GATE CS concepts with Free Live Classes on our youtube channel.

My Personal Notes arrow_drop_up
Recommended Articles
Page :