# Find pair for given sum in a sorted singly linked without extra space

• Difficulty Level : Hard
• Last Updated : 29 May, 2021

Given a sorted singly linked list and a value x, the task is to find pair whose sum is equal to x. We are not allowed to use any extra space and expected time complexity is O(n).

Examples:

```Input : head = 3-->6-->7-->8-->9-->10-->11 , x=17
Output: (6, 11), (7, 10), (8, 9)```

Hint : We are allowed to modify original linked list

A simple solution for this problem is to take each element one by one and traverse the remaining list in forward direction to find second element whose sum is equal to given value x. Time complexity for this approach will be O(n2).

An efficient solution for this problem is based on ideas discussed in below articles.
Find pair in doubly linked list : We use the same algorithm that traverses linked list from both ends.
XOR Linked list : In singly linked list, we can traverse list only in forward direction. We use XOR concept to convert a singly linked list to doubly linked list.

Below are steps :

• First we need to convert our singly linked list into doubly linked list. Here we are given singly linked list structure node which have only next pointer not prev pointer, so to convert our singly linked list into doubly linked list we use memory efficient doubly linked list ( XOR linked list ).
• In XOR linked list each next pointer of singly linked list contains XOR of next and prev pointer.
• After converting singly linked list into doubly linked list we initialize two pointers variables to find the candidate elements in the sorted doubly linked list. Initialize first with start of doubly linked list i.e; first = head and initialize second with last node of doubly linked list i.e; second = last_node.
• Here we donâ€™t have random access, so to initialize pointer, we traverse the list till last node and assign last node to second.
• If current sum of first and second is less than x, then we move first in forward direction. If current sum of first and second element is greater than x, then we move second in backward direction.
• Loop termination conditions are also different from arrays. The loop terminates when either of two pointers become NULL, or they cross each other (first=next_node), or they become same (first == second).

## C++

 `// C++ program to find pair with given sum in a singly``// linked list in O(n) time and no extra space.``#include``using` `namespace` `std;` `/* Link list node */``struct` `Node``{``    ``int` `data;` `    ``/* also contains XOR of next and``    ``previous node after conversion*/``    ``struct` `Node* next;``};` `/* Given a reference (pointer to pointer) to the head``    ``of a list and an int, push a new node on the front``    ``of the list. */``void` `insert(``struct` `Node** head_ref, ``int` `new_data)``{``    ``/* allocate node */``    ``struct` `Node* new_node =``        ``(``struct` `Node*) ``malloc``(``sizeof``(``struct` `Node));` `    ``/* put in the data */``    ``new_node->data = new_data;` `    ``/* link the old list off the new node */``    ``new_node->next = (*head_ref);` `    ``/* move the head to point to the new node */``    ``(*head_ref) = new_node;``}` `/* returns XORed value of the node addresses */``struct` `Node* XOR (``struct` `Node *a, ``struct` `Node *b)``{``    ``return` `(``struct` `Node*) ((``uintptr_t``) (a) ^ (``uintptr_t``) (b));``}` `// Utility function to convert singly linked list``// into XOR doubly linked list``void` `convert(``struct` `Node *head)``{``    ``// first we store address of next node in it``    ``// then take XOR of next node and previous node``    ``// and store it in next pointer``    ``struct` `Node *next_node;` `    ``// prev node stores the address of previously``    ``// visited node``    ``struct` `Node *prev = NULL;` `    ``// traverse list and store xor of address of``    ``// next_node and prev node in next pointer of node``    ``while` `(head != NULL)``    ``{``        ``// address of next node``        ``next_node = head->next;` `        ``// xor of next_node and prev node``        ``head->next = XOR(next_node, prev);` `        ``// update previous node``        ``prev = head;` `        ``// move head forward``        ``head = next_node;``    ``}``}` `// function to Find pair whose sum is equal to``// given value x``void` `pairSum(``struct` `Node *head, ``int` `x)``{``    ``// initialize first``    ``struct` `Node *first = head;` `    ``// next_node and prev node to calculate xor again``    ``// and find next and prev node while moving forward``    ``// and backward direction from both the corners``    ``struct` `Node *next_node = NULL, *prev = NULL;` `    ``// traverse list to initialize second pointer``    ``// here we need to move in forward direction so to``    ``// calculate next address we have to take xor``    ``// with prev pointer because (a^b)^b = a``    ``struct` `Node *second = head;``    ``while` `(second->next != prev)``    ``{``        ``struct` `Node *temp = second;``        ``second = XOR(second->next, prev);``        ``prev = temp;``    ``}` `    ``// now traverse from both the corners``    ``next_node = NULL;``    ``prev = NULL;` `    ``// here if we want to move forward then we must``    ``// know the prev address to calculate next node``    ``// and if we want to move backward then we must``    ``// know the next_node address to calculate prev node``    ``bool` `flag = ``false``;``    ``while` `(first != NULL && second != NULL &&``            ``first != second && first != next_node)``    ``{``        ``if` `((first->data + second->data)==x)``        ``{``            ``cout << ``"("` `<< first->data << ``","``                 ``<< second->data << ``")"` `<< endl;` `            ``flag = ``true``;` `            ``// move first in forward``            ``struct` `Node *temp = first;``            ``first = XOR(first->next,prev);``            ``prev = temp;` `            ``// move second in backward``            ``temp = second;``            ``second = XOR(second->next, next_node);``            ``next_node = temp;``        ``}``        ``else``        ``{``            ``if` `((first->data + second->data) < x)``            ``{``                ``// move first in forward``                ``struct` `Node *temp = first;``                ``first = XOR(first->next,prev);``                ``prev = temp;``            ``}``            ``else``            ``{``                ``// move second in backward``                ``struct` `Node *temp = second;``                ``second = XOR(second->next, next_node);``                ``next_node = temp;``            ``}``        ``}``    ``}``    ``if` `(flag == ``false``)``        ``cout << ``"No pair found"` `<< endl;``}` `// Driver program to run the case``int` `main()``{``    ``/* Start with the empty list */``    ``struct` `Node* head = NULL;``    ``int` `x = 17;` `    ``/* Use insert() to construct below list``    ``3-->6-->7-->8-->9-->10-->11 */``    ``insert(&head, 11);``    ``insert(&head, 10);``    ``insert(&head, 9);``    ``insert(&head, 8);``    ``insert(&head, 7);``    ``insert(&head, 6);``    ``insert(&head, 3);` `    ``// convert singly linked list into XOR doubly``    ``// linked list``    ``convert(head);``    ``pairSum(head,x);``    ``return` `0;``}`

Output:

`(6,11) , (7,10) , (8,9)`

Time complexity : O(n)

If linked list is not sorted, then we can sort the list as a first step. But in that case overall time complexity would become O(n Log n). We can use Hashing in such cases if extra space is not a constraint. The hashing based solution is same as method 2 here.
This article is contributed by Shashank Mishra ( Gullu ). If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article using write.geeksforgeeks.org or mail your article to contribute@geeksforgeeks.org. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks.