Difference between ELM and Typescript
ELM: Elm is a purely functional domain-based programming language used for front-end web development. Its syntax is different from what we have been doing in other coding languages. There are no loops and has lots of arrows and triangles. When it comes to which programming language should we learn first, Elm is ranked 15th while TypeScript is ranked 16th. Elm language guarantees no runtime errors which make it stand out from the other coding languages. Elm is a strongly typed web-based language. In Elm no variables are created, just models are created. Elm automatically stores them in the memory. Elm is more of functional development. However, people do get stuck while learning it and eventually give up because of its unique architecture but once you get your head around it, you’ll start enjoying it.
Features of ELM:
- Functional programming: ELM is a functional programming language that encourages immutability and pure functions.
- Strong typing: ELM is a strongly typed language, which helps catch errors at compile time.
- HTML integration: ELM allows for seamless integration with HTML and provides a clean syntax for writing HTML views.
- No runtime errors: ELM has a runtime that prevents runtime errors, making it more reliable than other languages.
- Immutable data structures: ELM uses immutable data structures, which means that data is never modified in place.
Features of TypeScript:
- Object-oriented programming: TypeScript is an object-oriented programming language that supports classes, interfaces, and inheritance.
- Strong typing: TypeScript is a strongly typed language that provides type annotations to catch errors at compile time.
- Large community: TypeScript has a large community of developers, which means that it has a vast ecosystem of tools and resources.
- Tooling support: TypeScript has excellent tooling support, including IDEs and code editors.
Similarities between ELM and TypeScript:
- Strong typing: Both ELM and TypeScript are strongly typed languages that provide type annotations to catch errors at compile time.
- Functional programming: While TypeScript is not strictly a functional programming language, it does support some functional programming concepts, such as higher-order functions and immutable data structures.
- Interoperability: Both ELM and TypeScript can interoperate with other languages, frameworks, and libraries.
- Type inference: Both ELM and TypeScript provide type inference, which means that types can be inferred automatically from the code.
- Open-source: Both ELM and TypeScript are open-source and have active communities of developers.
ELM vs TypeScript:
|Elm is a purely functional domain-based programming language||Typescript is an open-source language.|
|Elm language guarantees no runtime errors.||One might get errors in TypeScript.|
|There is no such thing as “any” in ELM language hence coders are forced to write proper and full-fledged codes.||No need to write full-fledged codes because type inference grants power and one doesn’t need to write full codes.|
|Elm uses virtual DOM and diffing.||TypeScript could use Virtual DOM but doesn’t use diffing.|
|Elm has beaten React and Angular when it comes to speed.||TypeScript has average speed.|
|In Elm no variables are created, just models are created and Elm automatically stores them in the memory.||TypeScript protects from all null or undefined objects. No unused parameters or variables that can be stored in a TypeScript language.|
Both Elm and TypeScript have their pros and cons but it depends on how one uses the resources to their fullest.
Please Login to comment...