Difference between Low Code Software Development and Traditional Software Development
In this article, we are going to learn the difference between low code software development and traditional software development.
Before visiting this difference, first we must know what’s low code software development and what’s traditional software development.
1. Low-code development :
Low code development as the name suggests in the software development process the development team has to write less code for the development. So, as a result with less effort the actual product can be developed. Actually in Low code development software applications are developed with the help pre-built app templates and user-friendly interfaces. So, it makes the product development and deployment process faster. Today, when there is a great demand in IT sector even non-IT people with little coding experience are also getting involved in software product development only due to this Low Code development.
As you will know, low-code builders don’t use traditional coding methods rather they permit to configure an app using graphical interfaces to drag-and-drop various elements.
Low-code platforms grant every entrepreneur an opportunity to enter the market fast and simple. It’s possible to form a replacement solution quickly and test whether it’s effective for your business and useful for purchasers.
2. Traditional Software Development :
This approach is also called as plan-driven software development which are often explained as a more formal approach to software development. These traditional software development process first follows a set of requirements then design then coding and so on.
These methodologies are the primary methods of software development. As these process is little bit complex and time taking that’s why they’re also called heavyweight methodologies. These methodologies are mostly supported a series of sequential steps, like requirements’ definition, solution building, testing and deployment.
Traditional software development methodologies first documents Software Requirement Specification (SRS) at the start of a project and then follows the other steps of Software Development Life Cycle(SDLC). Traditional methodologies are used for big critical systems with security and reliability like military systems.
Difference between Low Code Software Development and Traditional Software Development : S.NO. TRADITIONAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LOW CODE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
01. The traditional application development approach generally brings with it a spread of tools and multiple functions, which help the developers in creating highly complex applications. To be able to operate these apps accurately, one would require highly technical and complex skills during this field. The low-code platforms, on the opposite hand, don’t feature a large form of tools and functions. With a small set of tools, which might facilitate to develop various applications without much hassle. It becomes much easier for non-technical staff without the mastery of skills during this field. 02. Due to high technicalities and therefore the over complex nature, the custom application development platforms usually produce plenty of bugs, making it difficult for users to use the apps. In contrast, enterprise low-code platforms generally don’t produce bugs while building apps. This ends up in smooth running and hassle-free apps created by this technique. 03. Traditional or custom-made software is sort of expensive to create. Because developing a software application with traditional development process requires a lot of time, and resources which results a high budget in developing the project. Low-code platforms are way cheaper as compared to their traditional counterparts. This can be primarily because, with low-code platforms, an organization pays only to access the required service, not its development from start to end. 04. This is often usually a worthy option for giant companies that require highly customized software, which is difficult to make employing a low-code/no-code solution. This is often usually a worthy option for small and medium startups that require attractive software with less code and less development time. 05. Traditional development platforms generally have a sophisticated configuration system, making them less agile. Further, due to complex codes, it requires plenty of your time to find out and operate them accurately. In comparison, low-code platforms are much easier to use and operate because of their drag and drop features. Further, unlike custom development, you are doing not need to write codes here for developing the applications, as you’ll be able to simply use the drawing methods to try and do the identical. 06. With traditional coding, maintenance could be a big headache because the updates or revision would require an infatuated in-house or third-party development team to implement changes. Likewise, software revision, during this case, may be a cumbersome process that the teams need to plan, design, and test, followed by training users on new changes. Low Code Software Development. Contrary to the present, low-code platforms being APAAS(application platform as a service), are typically run and maintained by the corporate that owns the platform. This makes the method of maintenance simpler as all the updates and enhancements to the software are handled by the hosting company rather than the business subscribing to the service.
TRADITIONAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
LOW CODE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Attention reader! Don’t stop learning now. Get hold of all the important CS Theory concepts for SDE interviews with the CS Theory Course at a student-friendly price and become industry ready.