Open In App

Difference Between AES and RSA Encryption

Last Updated : 15 May, 2023
Improve
Improve
Like Article
Like
Save
Share
Report

Pre-requisites: AES, RSA

Encryption in cryptography is a process by which a plain text or a piece of information is converted into cipher text or a text which can only be decoded by the receiver for whom the information was intended. 

Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)

AES, a symmetric key encryption method developed by Belgian cryptographers Joan Daemen and Vincent Rijmen, was presented by NIST in 2001. Rijndael secures critical data in communication networks, financial transactions, and file storage. AES supports 128-bit data blocks and 128, 192, or 256-bit keys. Substitutions, permutations, and mixing are used to secure encryption. The transmitter and receiver share a key for symmetric encryption. Alice and Bob must securely exchange a secret key before sending an AES-encrypted message. Bob can decrypt the message using the same secret key.

AES

 

Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA)

Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman invented RSA in 1977. This encryption uses huge prime numbers and the difficulty of factoring large composite numbers. RSA encrypts and decrypts using public and private keys. The public key is disclosed, but the secret key is concealed. This enables keyless secure communication. Bob’s public key lets Alice send Bob an RSA-encrypted message. Bob’s private key decrypts the message. Digital signatures and key exchange use RSA. RSA is slower than AES and unsuitable for big data encryption owing to its computational complexity.

RSA working

 

 

Difference Between AES and RSA Encryption

Attribute

AES

RSA

Type Symmetric key encryption Asymmetric (public key) encryption
Key Length 128, 192, or 256 bits 1024, 2048, or 4096 bits (common)
Speed & Efficiency Fast and efficient for bulk data Slower, not suited for large data
Use Cases Encrypting files, databases, and channels Key exchange, authentication, signatures
Encryption Process Substitution-permutation network Modular exponentiation
Key Distribution Requires a secure method to share the secret key No need to securely share the public key
Computational Complexity Relatively low High, especially for large key lengths
Attack Resistance  Vulnerable to brute-force attacks, but still secure Vulnerable to advances in factoring techniques
Key Management  Easier, as only one key is involved More complex due to separate public and private keys
Suitability for Hardware Well-suited for hardware implementation Hardware implementation can be more challenging
Quantum Resistance  Vulnerable to quantum attacks (e.g., Grover’s algorithm) Potentially vulnerable to quantum attacks
Example Secure file storage and communication Secure email and digital certificates

Like Article
Suggest improvement
Share your thoughts in the comments

Similar Reads