Destructive Testing in Software Testing

Destructive Testing :
A Destructive test is one type of software testing similar to Bebugging in Software Testing. As in the Bebugging process, we add some known bugs into the software and monitor the rate of detection of errors. Similarly in Destructive testing, different points of failure in the software program are detected. With the help of this test, an application is intentionally performed to fail so that the robustness of the application is checked as well and various points of failure are also identified. As we know different types of software testing methods verify the performance of software, stability of software, compatibility of software, security of software, etc. Like by destructive testing we check the unwanted and unpredictable abnormal user behavior within the application.

In Destructive testing (or Destructive Physical Analysis, DPA) sample failure tests are performed, to understand the performance of the sample or the behavior of the materials under various loads. As compared to non-destructive tests these tests are usually much easier to perform and also easier to interpret. The destructive test is most appropriate, and economical, for things to be mass-produced, as the cost of destroying a few samples is negligible. Usually, this test procedure is not economical since only one or very few items are produced (for example, in the case of a building). The destructive failure mode is often analyzed and documented using a continuous high-speed camera recording (film loop) until the failure is detected. Failure can be detected with a sound detector or barometer that produces a signal to operate the high-speed camera.

The important thing is that even if you do not know the original requirements of a software product then also destructive testing can be performed. However, some knowledge can help develop a good testing strategy.

Importance of Destructive Testing

• Improving Security: Destructive testing finds security flaws by imitating attack scenarios, which allows programmers to strengthen their product against possible exploits.
• Meeting Quality Standards: Sticking to industry norms calls for extensive testing, including destructive testing, to guarantee software dependability and satisfy legal obligations.
• Finding Weaknesses: Destructive testing finds possible failure points in software by purposefully subjecting it to harsh circumstances or erroneous inputs.
• Building Confidence: By proving the software’s resilience to challenging circumstances, extensive destructive testing builds stakeholder confidence and enhances user satisfaction.
• Cost Reduction: By identifying and fixing flaws before deployment, destructive testing invested early in the development process avoids expensive problems later.

What did it Achieve in this Test?

• Appropriate behavior of the program
• Inappropriate program behavior
• Improper use
• Incorrect input data
• Appropriate output data

How are These Tests Done Review- Alpha/Beta Review?

Destructive testing includes many activities such as designing a set of test scripts, executing test scripts, raising errors, closing errors, and providing metrics for success or failure to stakeholders at the end of iteration.

For a destructive test, there are many ways in which it can be tested. Let’s see some examples –

• Failure Point Analysis Method –
  This is a detailed tour of the system that assesses errors that can occur at different points. For this strategy, help can be obtained from BA (Business Analyst).
• Peer Testers Review –
  This test is performed by a fellow tester to analyze the test cases and review those who are less familiar with the system/function.
• Business review of test cases –
  End users or experts may think of many valid scenarios that testers may not think about or miss because their focus will be entirely on testing requirements.
• Take an Exploratory Test Using Run Sheets –
  An Exploratory Test using Running Sheets will help determine what is tested, repeat tests, and allow you to control your test coverage.

Methods of Destructive Testing 

The following are the various destructive test methods 

• Mutation Testing: It is the deliberate alteration of specific codebase sections to evaluate how well the test suite detects those changes.
• Load Testing: It involves simulating usage levels that are higher than typical to assess the software’s performance.
• Security Testing: Testing software’s security by trying to take advantage of flaws to measure how resistant it is to intrusions.
• Stress Testing: It involves pushing the program beyond its typical limits to evaluate its robustness and stability under heavy loads.
• Fault Injection Testing: purposefully inserting mistakes or faults into the program to see how it reacts and spot possible flaws.
• Fuzz Testing: It is the process of giving software unexpected, incorrect, or random inputs to find bugs or unusual behaviors.

Techniques of Destructive Testing

The following are destructive testing techniques that can be used with modifications:

• White box test: It involves actively altering the system configuration or source code to see how the system reacts to different adjustments. This could entail adding errors or vulnerabilities to the software to test the system’s robustness and resilience in challenging circumstances.
• Security test: It includes initiating fictitious cyberattacks, including injection or denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, to evaluate the system’s resilience against hostile activity and safeguard critical information in the event of an attack.
• Defect testing: This includes actively introducing flaws or problems into a system to assess how well it can tolerate errors and handle them. This can involve manipulating hardware malfunctions, software defects, or environmental irregularities to see how the system reacts to and recovers from them.
• Smoke test: To find possible weak points or failure modes, a system may be put under intense stress or pressure during a smoke test. To test the system’s resilience and cause system failures, this could involve placing excessive demands on it or limiting its resources.

Lastly in this technique, an application is intentionally performed to a program failure to verify the robustness of the application even with zero knowledge of the original requirements of a software product.

Advantages of Destructive Testing

• Identifies software weaknesses by testing under unexpected conditions.
• Improves software quality by identifying and fixing issues.
• Reduces risks associated with software failure.
• Increases customer satisfaction by delivering high-quality software.
• Cost-effective by identifying issues early in the development cycle.

Disadvantages of Destructive Testing

• Destructive testing may cause damage to the system or its components, leading to increased costs and downtime for repairs.
• It requires specialized tools and equipment, which can be expensive and limit accessibility.
• Destructive testing has a limited scope and may not cover all possible scenarios or issues.
• It may not fully replicate real-world scenarios or user behavior, leading to missed issues or inaccuracies in test results.
• Destructive testing may not be suitable for all types of software, particularly critical or sensitive.

Conclusion

In software testing, destructive testing is an essential part of making sure software systems are reliable and robust. Destructive testing seeks to find flaws and vulnerabilities in the software that would not be discovered through routine testing techniques by putting it through harsh environments and stressful scenarios. Improving the robustness and quality of software systems in real-world settings requires incorporating Destructive Testing throughout the entire testing approach.