# Balanced Binary Search Trees

Question 1 |

The worst case running time to search for an element in a balanced in a binary search tree with n2^n elements is

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

A | |

B | |

C | |

D |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 1 Explanation:

Time taken to search an element is where h is the height of Binary Search Tree (BST). The growth of height of a balanced BST is logerthimic in terms of number of nodes. So the worst case time to search an element would be which is Which is which can be written as .

Question 2 |

What is the maximum height of any AVL-tree with 7 nodes? Assume that the height of a tree with a single node is 0.

2 | |

3 | |

4 | |

5 |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 2 Explanation:

AVL trees are binary trees with the following restrictions.
1) the height difference of the children is at most 1.
2) both children are AVL trees
Following is the most unbalanced AVL tree that we can get with 7 nodes

a / \ / \ b c / \ / / \ / d e g / / h

Question 3 |

What is the worst case possible height of AVL tree?

2Logn Assume base of log is 2 | |

1.44log n Assume base of log is 2 | |

Depends upon implementation | |

Theta(n) |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 3 Explanation:

Question 4 |

Which of the following is AVL Tree?

A100 / 50 200 / 10 300B100 / 50 200 / / 10 150 300 / 5C100 / 50 200 / / 10 60 150 300 / 5 180 400

Only A | |

A and C | |

A, B and C | |

Only B |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 4 Explanation:

A Binary Search Tree is AVL if balance factor of every node is either -1 or 0 or 1. Balance factor of a node X is [(height of X->left) - (height of X->right)].
In Tree B, the node with value 50 has balance factor 2. That is why B is not an AVL tree.

Question 5 |

Consider the following AVL tree.

60 / 20 100 / 80 120Which of the following is updated AVL tree after insertion of 70

A70 / 60 100 / / 20 80 120B100 / 60 120 / / 20 70 80C80 / 60 100 / 20 70 120D80 / 60 100 / / 20 70 120

A | |

B | |

C | |

D |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 5 Explanation:

Refer following for steps used in AVL insertion.
AVL Tree | Set 1 (Insertion)

After insertion of 70, tree becomes following 60 / \ 20 100 / \ 80 120 / 70We start from 50 and travel up. We keep travelling up till we find an unbalanced node. In above case, we reach the node 60 and see 60 got unbalanced after insertion and this is Right Left Case. So we need to apply two rotations

60 60 80 / \ Right Rotate(100) / \ Left Rotate(60) / \ 20 100 -----------------> 20 80 ---------------> 60 100 / \ / \ / \ \ 80 120 70 100 20 70 120 / \ 70 120

Question 6 |

Which of the following is a self-adjusting or self-balancing Binary Search Tree

Splay Tree | |

AVL Tree | |

Red Black Tree | |

All of the above |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 6 Explanation:

Question 7 |

Consider the following left-rotate and right-rotate functions commonly used in self-adjusting BSTs

T1, T2 and T3 are subtrees of the tree rooted with y (on left side) or x (on right side) y x / Right Rotation / x T3 – - – - – - – > T1 y / < - - - - - - - / T1 T2 Left Rotation T2 T3Which of the following is tightest upper bound for left-rotate and right-rotate operations.

O(1) | |

O(Logn) | |

O(LogLogn) | |

O(n) |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 7 Explanation:

The rotation operations (left and right rotate) take constant time as only few pointers are being changed there. Following are C implementations of left-rotate and right-rotate

Question 8 |

Which of the following is true

The AVL trees are more balanced compared to Red Black Trees, but they may cause more rotations during insertion and deletion. | |

Heights of AVL and Red-Black trees are generally same, but AVL Trees may cause more rotations during insertion and deletion. | |

Red Black trees are more balanced compared to AVL Trees, but may cause more rotations during insertion and deletion. | |

Heights of AVL and Red-Black trees are generally same, but Red Black rees may cause more rotations during insertion and deletion. |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 8 Explanation:

Red Black Tree with n nodes has height <= 2Log2(n+1)
AVL Tree with n nodes has height less than Log

_{φ}(√5(n+2)) - 2. Therefore, the AVL trees are more balanced compared to Red Black Trees, but they may cause more rotations during insertion and deletion. So if your application involves many frequent insertions and deletions, then Red Black trees should be preferred. And if the insertions and deletions are less frequent and search is more frequent operation, then AVL tree should be preferred over Red Black Tree.Question 9 |

Which of the following is true about Red Black Trees?

The path from the root to the furthest leaf is no more than twice as long as the path from the root to the nearest leaf | |

At least one children of every black node is red | |

Root may be red | |

A leaf node may be red |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 9 Explanation:

Question 10 |

Which of the following is true about AVL and Red Black Trees?

In AVL tree insert() operation, we first traverse from root to newly inserted node and then from newly inserted node to root. While in Red Black tree insert(), we only traverse once from root to newly inserted node. | |

In both AVL and Red Black insert operations, we traverse only once from root to newly inserted node, | |

In both AVL and Red Black insert operations, we traverse twiceL first traverse root to newly inserted node and then from newly inserted node to root. | |

None of the above |

**Balanced Binary Search Trees**

**Discuss it**

Question 10 Explanation:

Refer Red Black Tree Insertion and AVL Tree Insertion

There are 20 questions to complete.